Have a buddy whos a commercial fisherman in alaska.
They were expecting a huge pink year this well and its coming at roughly 60-70% of original forecast.
Hope thats not the case here.
this is quite common and for a specific year the preseason forecast can be highly inaccurate. A few examples; 2017 was forecast at 8.7 million but came in at 3.7, the lowest return in a couple of decades, 2015 was forecast at 14.5 but came in at 6.2 million, 2007 was forecast at 19+ million but came in at 11 million.
Not related to pinks but the sockeye forecast for 2009 was 9 million but came in around 1 million.
Of course it also flips the other way. Also in my experience huge returns do not always turn into proportionally better fishing in river as so many fish can be caught by commercial fisheries in the tidewater. The escapement targets at around 6 to 7 million are not adjusted upwards when the return is very large so there is a potential for millions pinks to be caught in nets.
Just wanted to mention that the actual forecast DFO issues included the probability of the run size so accounts for possible error. The forecast of 27 million is really that the is a 50% probability of it being 27 million
or higher. Conversely there is a 50% probability it will be lower. The forecast is actually a curve called a cumulative distribution function that expresses the chances that a particular variable will take on a specific range of values and looks something like:
