There's always 2 sides to a story Dave. When looking at which side to believe I always try and examine the motivation. The feedlot industry and the government are fighting to protect an industry that clearly shouldn't exist due to the damage they are causing, versus a few individuals who care about the environment, using private donations to educate the public.
A personal distaste I have is the sleezy approach the salmonconfidential.com people took to stealing the salmonconfidential .ca website name and registering it under .com, then using it to slag the movie and people that made it. They obviously took advantage of the naivety of the salmonconfidential people, who clearly should have registered the .com name as well. But this is an indication of the characteristics of the "anonymous", read "feedlot" people who are spreading their own special form of manure on their website.
Yeah, lets talk about sleaziness and the ethics of Morton and Roscovich ... what would you call editing Dr's Jones, Miller and Marty's testimony and interviews to spin their version of declining salmon in BC? Or for Roscovich pretending to be a television reporter to obtain an interview with Gary Marty? One word that comes to my mind is shameless.
Why is there no mention of overfishing from sporties, commercial and aboriginal fishers (oh right, they are the main supporters of this group) or habitat loss or climate change in this entire film? How can anyone truly believe salmon farms are the cause of wild salmon declines when in over 30 years here in BC, there has not been one single incident to support that claim?
You are constantly calling for transparency regarding salmon farms and yet you, Chris and others seem OK with and indeed support these people and this shoddy and unethical journalism.