Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Dave]

Are the eggs in danger of being swept away at 3.2 Meters?  Wasn't it in 2006 the flood washed away a lot of eggs and they had to close the chum retention when that generation came back to spawn?

There hasn't been a lot of spawning yet so that won't be an issue, but if this was Dec 2 there might have been a problem.

[chris gadsden]

Very high I will have a video soon and pictures on the Fraser Valley Salmon Society FB page too for you all.

[chris gadsden]

Here you go.https://youtu.be/DYCn87NEIC4

[stsfisher]

Here you go.https://youtu.be/DYCn87NEIC4

Did you manage to retrieve that float Chris?

[spoiler]

go for a drive up to the slab today and see what's going on!
you guys can tell me if you think that's ethical fishing?

[psd1179]

go for a drive up to the slab today and see what's going on!
you guys can tell me if you think that's ethical fishing?

Did you find parking spot LOL

[clarki]

So something I'm not getting....

When I look at the Chilliwack River hydrometric data graph with the default date setting of 8 days, it shows a current level of 3.1 m and a discharge of 260 m3/s

When I change the date range to be over 11 months, it shows a current level of 2.7 m and a discharge of 210.

Why the difference? 

[milo]

So something I'm not getting....

When I look at the Chilliwack River hydrometric data graph with the default date setting of 8 days, it shows a current level of 3.1 m and a discharge of 260 m3/s

When I change the date range to be over 11 months, it shows a current level of 2.7 m and a discharge of 210.

Why the difference?

Government messing with your head.
What did you expect? Consistency? 

[typhoon]

So something I'm not getting....

When I look at the Chilliwack River hydrometric data graph with the default date setting of 8 days, it shows a current level of 3.1 m and a discharge of 260 m3/s

When I change the date range to be over 11 months, it shows a current level of 2.7 m and a discharge of 210.

Why the difference?

It could be that it switches to a weekly measure with the larger range...

<edit>
Nope. It still says "The most recent primary water level recorded is 3.095 metres at 2018-11-02 09:20:00 LST." when I change the range to 11 months.

[chris gadsden]

Did you manage to retrieve that float Chris?

50 of them plus a lot of garbage too.

[stsfisher]

 

50 of them plus a lot of garbage too.

 

[chris gadsden]

River has dropped 2 feet but will still be unfishable except for the dippers.

[RalphH]

River has dropped 2 feet but will still be unfishable except for the dippers.

I really love those little Dipper Birds and they are a joy to watch. Some of then around Allison are almost tame. I wish you would stop saying terrible things about these sweet little creatures:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyFEbuy8RUg

[Morty]

When I look at the Chilliwack River hydrometric data graph with the default date setting of 8 days, it shows a current level of 3.1 m and a discharge of 260 m3/s
When I change the date range to be over 11 months, it shows a current level of 2.7 m and a discharge of 210.
Why the difference?

Are you getting those number from reading the graph, or from the data descriptions down below the date settings?

[clarki]

From the graph, but it seems they are more aligned today