so does this mean that shoreline, foot access sport fishers will not be hindered from access to the fishery???
can a guy shuttle fishers to the bars in this area and drop them off, thus never needing to actually fully anchor up??
As I understand legal matters, letter of word is VERY important in trying to prosecute someone for an apparent or alledged violation of law. This interim injunction as written in the above post, indicates anchored boat fishermen. Any shoreline fisher who is interupted or arrested by the RCMP in this area will definately have a strong case against any charges.
I don't work monday tuesday and I'm going to go investigate, with camera and notebook and cellphone in hand.
I encourage ALL parties to maintain thier usual presence on the river even if you are not fishing but avoid altercation and give a wide berth to native boats. OBSERVE RECORD AND REPORT is our duty as conservation motivated sportfishers.
A lot of film footage could be gleaned this weekend to be made availlable to local media and as evidence for the SDA in any court defense if we maintain a civil but ever vigilant presence on the river. Be sure if you are using a camera that prints the date on the photo, to set the proper date prior to filming.
This is Canada, there are no borders within our country other than the provincial borders and the area outlined by the cheam IS NOT recognized as Native private property nor is this entire area labelled as reserve land nor is it a seperate province from the rest of B.C.... to the best of my knowledge.
If the moderators feel this post is suggesting action beyond what you feel is appropriate feel free to modify this post