Hi both FA and 2.40, thanks for the repiles.
Although I take on board what you are saying about the water conditions, when I fished Ranger Run back in July it was both fast and "choppy"
It held fish, I know because people were pulling them out around me all day! Fish were coming out of the fast water.
I needed losts of weight to get the bait down in the fast water conditions, non of my Drennans could cope, hence I used the floamies.
I think my point here is that I can't see how any 1 type of float is more sensitive than another, unless we look a quite different design.
The reason I think this is that any float (standard design) takes x amount to pull it under, the more weight we add the less it takes to go under.
But if I fish a Drennan with little enough weight to ride the waves, it is no more sensative than using a floam tude that does the same thing, they both need the same amount of weight to pull them under?
Can you see my point?
If fishing steady water with no boils/waves then the most sensitive way of fishing is to have the float only just visible, so a minimal pull will take it under. In this case the Drennans are better suited as they have a tappered top so you can get them down in the water, a floamie with a flat top doesn't supply these options.
But if you wanted a really sensitive setup for steady water we'd be using floats like Drennans with an thin bit on top that would create the tiny bouyancy to enable very sensitive bite indication with next to no resistance to the fish, as long as you spent the time to balance the setup carfully.
what do you think?
cheers,
Paul.