Thanks. Pretty good article. It's very true that over the decades, despite many promises (mostly broken) made by DFO to err on the side of conservation and healthy escapements they inevitably move to harvest allowances that benefit business interests at the expense of conservation and the environment. Equally strange considering many people believe that DFO remains the authoritative voice on the perils or lack thereof of open net salmon farming. How can they (DFO) be so biased in one case but so objective and neutral in the other?