I find it interesting that, given the arguments last week, Mainstream's lawyer did not anticipate that the defense was going to present the same papers on the elevated levels of contaminates in farmed salmon and, therefore, should have been prepared with those papers Ruth Salmon suggested were out there contesting the scientific findings. It made her argument that the science had been refuted to the point that “We don’t have a controversy now” seem very weak, especially given the subsequent paper confirming the higher levels of contaminates in farmed salmon. Very weak.