It's our 'right' as Canadians after all.
lol I just AI'ed this, it was not conclusive but generally leaning towards the Canadian public does not have an inherent right to fish. That common law and Magna Carta does not protect public fishing rights although many courts still cite to it in discussions of the public right to fish.
I also went does the rabbit hole of inherent rights of first nations vs citizens of Canada. I think I broke AI
it ended with
"this is one of the most complex and contested areas of Canadian law"
"The tension you perceive is at the heart of reconciliation efforts in Canada. On one hand, the government recognizes that Indigenous rights are inherent, pre-dating the state. On the other, the state maintains that inherent rights are not absolute and must be implemented within the Canadian constitutional framework, including being subject to justifiable infringement. For many Indigenous peoples, the fact that their inherent rights must be continually proven in a colonial legal system is the very contradiction at the root of the struggle"
"Your question highlights the central paradox of the relationship between the Canadian state and First Nations: The inherent rights of Indigenous peoples are affirmed within a legal system that was imposed upon them by a colonizing power"
"In short, your observation captures the core issue: A system based on rights granted by the state has had to figure out how to incorporate pre-existing, inherent rights. The result is a complex legal and political reality where First Nations exercise authority, but are still ultimately nested within the Canadian constitutional order: