Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: First Nations Cheam illegal fishing  (Read 4732 times)

casinoJim

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 269
First Nations Cheam illegal fishing
« on: August 12, 2004, 12:03:09 AM »

CANADA
Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans
Comité permanent des pêches et des océans
EVIDENCE NUMBER 12,
TÉMOIGNAGES DU COMITÉ NUMÉRO 12
UNEDITED COPY – COPIE NON ÉDITÉE
Thursday April 29, 2004 – le jeudi 29 avril 2004

<edit CJ Page #18>
I have received a letter from the Sportfishing Defence Alliance and it reads as follows,
and this was a letter sent to the current minister of fisheries. I'm only going to read you
the first paragraph.
Dear Minister Regan:
Our members are reporting that the illegal drift gillnet fishery has once again started in the Fraser River,
upstream of the Agassiz-RosedaleBridge. In addition to the illegal drift gillnets there are numerous set
gillnets operating seven days a week in defiance of the law. These operations are not being carried out
clandestinely but in plain view of the public highway and your enforcement staff. Our members have
repeatedly reported these infractions to your department through the Observe, Record & Report Program
with no response action from your department at all. In view of the government's response that where
problems are identified DFO initiates actions to provide proper control and monitoring, what is DFO
Western Region doing about the reported illegal drift gillnet fishery on the Agassiz-RosedaleBridge area of
the Fraser River?

Mr. Radford.
Mr. Don Radford: This is Don Radford in Vancouver.
The fishing that's been identified in the letter from the Sportfishing Defence Alliance is
related to a small group of Cheam First Nation participants. Action that we are taking is
to work very closely with the majority of the Cheam Band, including the elected chief
and council to develop an agreed-upon fishing plan for this year to provide us with a
basis to have support from the band to address the illegal fishing that's happening in that
area.
My understanding is the fishing that is happening is a very small group, a minority of
band members and that it's our intent to establish a relationship with the Cheam Band that
will facilitate enforcement of that kind of activity. I have to note that the relationship with
the Cheam Band has vastly improved in recent months over previous years with the
election of a new chief and council and that we are making significant progress in our
work with the band. The level of illegal activity that is occurring is much reduced and we
hope to reduce it even further to the point of being negligible.
The Chair: Well, good luck to you in that, Mr. Radford.
But another paragraph goes on to read:
This is the fifth year in a row that this illegal, continuous and high-impact illegal fishery has been allowed
to go on unchecked by your department. Not only that, but it is the fifth year that such fisheries have gone
on unchallenged during the migration period of stocks of high concern or endangered stocks.
Is that an accurate statement?
Mr. Radford.
Mr. Don Radford:
Yes, I'm just trying to digest the....
Could you please read the statement again?
&#56256;&#56487; (1150)
The Chair: Yes.
This is the fifth year in a row that this illegal, continuous and high-impact illegal fishery has been allowed
to go on unchecked by your department.
I'll stop there.
Is it true that for five years illegal fishing has been going on in this area while you talk
to the band?
Mr. Don Radford: I would dispute that. I think that we have not had a relationship
that allowed us to talk to the band for the past five years. That relationship is very recent,
perhaps within the last six to seven months.

http://www.johncummins.ca/docs/2004%20Apr%2029%20BLUES%20-%20FISH%20COMMITTEE.pdf

CJ :(

« Last Edit: August 12, 2004, 09:24:17 AM by casinoJim »
Logged
Never,never,never,never,never,never give up!

chris gadsden

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13881
Re:First Nations Cheam illegal fishing
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2004, 12:13:01 AM »

Now the truth of what is going on is coming out. Thanks again CJ.

This is exactly what we have been talking about what has gone on and is going on but FOC keeps wanting to deny it.

 If only the officers in the field would talk. Actually one did or his wife did, must try to dig that letter up.

casinoJim

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 269
Re:First Nations Cheam illegal fishing
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2004, 12:35:46 AM »

I spent hours reading this report I wish I could copy and paste the whole thing for you guys...
Follow the link and at least goto pages 18 ... then 33 at the very least do read those few pages.

 :'( >:( >:(
CJ.
Logged
Never,never,never,never,never,never give up!

Fish Assassin

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10810
Re:First Nations Cheam illegal fishing
« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2004, 12:40:00 AM »

I've read bits and pieces. Very interesting. Thanks for posting.
Logged

The Gilly

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 985
  • Let equity be the rule of our actions
Re:First Nations Cheam illegal fishing
« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2004, 08:09:05 AM »

Driving west on the #1 on the way home from the Okanagan last night and saw them drifting in the area of Sea Bird.  I wish I had my camera in the truck.
Logged

pepsitrev

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1076
  • my family and fishin are #1 in my life
Re:First Nations Cheam illegal fishing
« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2004, 08:21:27 AM »

thanx cj that was good reading.
Logged

casinoJim

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 269
Re:First Nations Cheam illegal fishing
« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2004, 07:41:42 PM »

Your welcome pepsitrev amazing eh?
Logged
Never,never,never,never,never,never give up!

Fish Assassin

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10810
Re:First Nations Cheam illegal fishing
« Reply #7 on: August 12, 2004, 09:23:44 PM »

We're talking about politicians and senior bureaucrats here. They speak a language known and understood by themselves.
Logged