Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: 121 LBS Chinook?? Those were the days!  (Read 7763 times)

scouterjames

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 549
121 LBS Chinook?? Those were the days!
« on: December 17, 2015, 09:43:42 PM »
Logged
:-\ Tell me, and I might forget;
  :) Show me, and I might remember;
    ;D INVOLVE ME, and I'll learn.

Dave

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3415
Re: 121 LBS Chinook?? Those were the days!
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2015, 10:07:27 PM »
Thanks for that sj :)
Logged

dave c

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 487
Re: 121 LBS Chinook?? Those were the days!
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2015, 12:52:03 AM »
WOW. I guess one might want to rethink the 4/0 hook and 12lb test.
Logged

typhoon

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1328
Re: 121 LBS Chinook?? Those were the days!
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2015, 06:46:35 AM »
Pretty amazing to see fish of that size so far south.
Logged

halcyonguitars

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 681
Re: 121 LBS Chinook?? Those were the days!
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2015, 10:37:22 PM »
So, dams messed that up too.
Logged

stsfisher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 427
Re: 121 LBS Chinook?? Those were the days!
« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2015, 07:00:06 AM »
Quote from: halcyonguitars on December 18, 2015, 10:37:22 PM
So, dams messed that up too.

Pretty sure that the harvest of these June Hogs would have resulted in the same fait for these fish. 2 million plus cans, wow!!! The Dams would not have helped for sure.
Logged

Drewhill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 367
Re: 121 LBS Chinook?? Those were the days!
« Reply #6 on: December 19, 2015, 10:21:43 AM »
I'd love to see one of KWB's finest snag that one in the tail
Logged

VAGAbond

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 538
Re: 121 LBS Chinook?? Those were the days!
« Reply #7 on: December 19, 2015, 04:25:25 PM »
Those puppies used to travel all the way up the Columbia past Revelstoke and Golden to spawn just downstream of Lake Windermere north of the present town of Athalmer that used to be known as Salmonbed because of the numbers of huge chinook.  I have read of Hudson Bay fur records reporting large numbers of bear pelts from that region,  due undoubtedly to the attraction of the spawning salmon.

The Grand Coulee wiped out those runs in 1938.  I have wondered if the runs survived to that time in spite of the massive harvest or were they on the way down before the dam.
Logged

islanddude

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 207
Re: 121 LBS Chinook?? Those were the days!
« Reply #8 on: December 19, 2015, 08:20:23 PM »
Some of the old timers when I lived in Chilliwack told me about a race of large chinook that spawned in the Frazer watershed. This could be just a  myth. I have seen pictures of the tinned salmon that came from the Frazer. The main stream isn't damned but how many big springs are left, let alone the other species of salmon.
Logged

243Pete

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 284
Re: 121 LBS Chinook?? Those were the days!
« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2015, 10:22:58 PM »
Damn... reminds me of something I read a little while back about prehistoric salmon in the 300+ pound range.

I'm thinking the 3/0 might be fine but the 12lb leader might be stretching it a tad. :P
Logged

Fish or cut bait.

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 642
Re: 121 LBS Chinook?? Those were the days!
« Reply #10 on: December 21, 2015, 11:30:06 AM »
300 lb prehistoric salmon?
Link please.
Logged

243Pete

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 284
Re: 121 LBS Chinook?? Those were the days!
« Reply #11 on: December 21, 2015, 11:37:11 PM »
Logged