Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: SOCKEYE IN THE COQUITLAM?  (Read 4397 times)

CAPTAIN BONK

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 948
  • THERE'S NO HEAD BETTER THEN STEELHEAD !
SOCKEYE IN THE COQUITLAM?
« on: June 14, 2004, 02:36:07 PM »

I HEARD A RUMOR 2 DAY THAT THEY MIGHT B STOCKING THE COQUITLAM WITH SOCKEYE SOON ! NE BODY ELSE HEAR ABOUT THIS ?
Logged

Uncivil

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 89
  • 'Geers on Gear
Re:SOCKEYE IN THE COQUITLAM?
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2004, 03:05:11 PM »

As I understand it BC Hydro, WLAP and the Kwaykwitlem (sp) first nation are investigating the feasibility of reintroducing sockeye to the system.  As I understand it it would have something to do with either taking existing fish from the reservoir and allowing them past the dam and transporting them back over the dam at the end of the migration.  or it is to reintroduce fish from another system into the Coquitlam watershed.  The last report I heard is that the GVRD is against this proposal because they are concerned about the impact of decaying salmon carcasses in the drinking water system.  If it happens it probably won't happen soon and the costs will be high.  That is my understanding but I am sure there is someone else out there with better information than I have.  Cheers.
Logged
We can build it, take me to your Banker!

CAPTAIN BONK

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 948
  • THERE'S NO HEAD BETTER THEN STEELHEAD !
Re:SOCKEYE IN THE COQUITLAM?
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2004, 02:41:04 PM »

SO IT'S SETTLED..................... NOT HAPPENING ! :'(
Logged

otto

  • Guest
Re:SOCKEYE IN THE COQUITLAM?
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2004, 04:26:10 PM »

so is it going to be bass or salmon or both? im so confused
Logged

THE_ROE_SLINGER

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3029
  • Roe Wizzard
Re:SOCKEYE IN THE COQUITLAM?
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2004, 08:53:25 PM »

thanks for the info
Logged
weeeeeeeeeow!