Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Chehalis  (Read 2427 times)

patagonia

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
Chehalis
« on: October 20, 2009, 09:50:35 AM »
Why have they not imposed a boundary for fishing on the Chehalis similar to the change made on the Chilliwack at the boundary hole?? It seems insane to allow "fishermen" to hammer all the fish stacked up in the trench down from the hatchery...
Logged

HOOK

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2513
Re: Chehalis
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2009, 10:17:40 AM »
its almost as though they dont care especially since the river blew through the bushed a few years ago. I think the part of the river coming out of the hatchery should be closed all together. Why fish there when you can fish the main river a short walk away  ::)
Logged
Check out our new blog



http://funonthefly.blogspot.ca/

Todd Oishi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 150
  • Maple Ridge, BC
    • Innovative Fly Fisher
Re: Chehalis
« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2009, 12:06:36 PM »
It would be nice to see some changes made to stop that sort of "angling"...
Logged
.
>>>http://innovativeflyfisher.com/forum<<<


For me, the quality of a trout is not measured in pounds and inches, but rather by the journey and circumstances that allowed our paths to cross...
.

redtide

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 556
  • catch anything?
Re: Chehalis
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2009, 08:02:32 PM »
the hatchery only use wild fish for brood stock. those fish in the "hammer zone" are mostly hatchery fish. i guess they don't care about the return of hatchery fish since they will not be used for eggs or milt. But aren't all the hatchery fish entering the hatchery given to  the chehalis band as food anyway. just wondering :-\
Logged