I have a few interesting questions myself:
1) do you believe that if seal numbers had stayed the same, that chinook and coho returns in the Squamish and other major river system would be about the same as they were in 1970?
2) that someone will offer to shoot and remove 10,000 , 20,000 or more seals plus recover, remove and process the carcasses for free?
3) seals are the single cause of salmon decline on the Pacific Northwest Coast?
4) That every person with a single reason among dozens for 'explaining' the progressive collapse of salmon stocks on the south coast...you know it was the herring collapse, it was clear cut logging, it was high seas drift net fishing, it was the Alaskans, it was the commies, it was the native fishery, yada yada.. has suddenly discovered it was the seals and this has nothing to do with the fact they always wanted to 'cull' (slaughter) all the seals anyway?
5) that it is always the seals, otherwise we'd be up to our asses in salmon like great grandad was in 1900?
6) try to get that kid at UBC to correlate population growth in southern BC with salmon numbers. When we see the p value do we support a cull for humans?
...all makes about as much sense to me...
go for it dudes!