Realy Banx? Implying conflict of interest? Looks like you want me to post only links that you want to hear. That to me is propaganda. If you actually took the time to open my links and see the links they provide you will find that, yes I do care about wild stocks. There are still many problems with closed containment and I would not brag about one that says we are doing it right and sea pens are doing it wrong while at the same time not being transparent them selves at all. That seems to be a conflict of interest to me.
Also, you imply that farms are likely detrimental and then not to blame. Can you make up my mind for me. On top of that, nobody is stopping you from posting links that you would like to debate about. Warning, some of us do not do face book. Join the fun not the fight. ![Smiley :)](http://www.fishingwithrod.com/yabbse/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
yes really bob. no I'm fine with you posting links from other organizations other than your top three that start with
www.salmonfarm. and most of those are written with such personal bias it's tough to believe they are being impartial.
also robert, it's also possible for something to be detrimental and not the root cause of a problem....
take for instance the seymour river estuary. there's no real habitat due to industrial development for these smolts to grow, they get flushed out pretty quick. literally.....a bunch of them end up in the capilano (steelhead radio tagged)..... now ask these same fish to swim by a few farms where sea lice can be, here's the word, detrimental. would a farm be the sole culprit of that fish not surviving... of course not, but does it benefit that fish? no. obviously it doesn't.
does that not make sense to you?
post all you want bob, everybody's got a job to do man, bills to pay. you know how it is
![Kiss :-*](http://www.fishingwithrod.com/yabbse/Smileys/default/kiss.gif)