Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: 5 year sockeye  (Read 5024 times)

aquapaloosa

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 659
  • They don't call'em fish for nothin.
5 year sockeye
« on: August 30, 2010, 10:25:16 PM »

Could this run of sockeye be last years fish being 5 years old?
Logged
Chicken farm, pig farm, cow farm, fish farm.

Gooey

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1618
Re: 5 year sockeye
« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2010, 06:28:05 AM »

Doubt it, I believe scales are like tree rings, you can use them to tell age...if a whole whack of fish for some odd reason cam back a year lete (ie 5 year olds) DFo could tell.  I am fairly certain DFO does genetic testing and collects scale samples from the test fishers so I think they would have picked up on that if it were the case.
Logged

jimmywits

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 453
Re: 5 year sockeye
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2010, 09:34:03 AM »

Could this run of sockeye be last years fish being 5 years old?
Interesting idea, would be good to hear from DFO on that one.
Logged

kingpin

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1034
Re: 5 year sockeye
« Reply #3 on: August 31, 2010, 06:36:44 PM »

the pitt gets 5 and 6 year sockeye...but no I doubt the sockeye would have skipped last year and became 5 year fish.
Logged
Im an advocate for the supremacy of the bait fisherman race and a firm believer in the purity of it.

lude98r

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 87
Re: 5 year sockeye
« Reply #4 on: September 01, 2010, 11:48:09 AM »

What are the chances that they dont always return to their original river system?
Logged

anorden

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 160
Re: 5 year sockeye
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2010, 05:35:03 PM »

the pitt gets 5 and 6 year sockeye...but no I doubt the sockeye would have skipped last year and became 5 year fish.

If so then they would be bigger average size
Logged

Robert_G

  • Guest
Re: 5 year sockeye
« Reply #6 on: September 06, 2010, 06:14:08 PM »

DNA sampling has shown that the bulk of these 30 million fish are Shuswap stock.
The majority of the missing fish last year were early and mid summer runs. Last years Adams run was never supposed to be more than a million fish at best.
Logged

StillAqua

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 489
Re: 5 year sockeye
« Reply #7 on: September 06, 2010, 08:56:56 PM »

Yup...they were Chilko and Quesnel fish that didn't show last year, not Adams/Late Shuswap.
But if there weren't as many 2009 sockeye feeding out in the ocean, maybe there was more food around for the 2010 fish so they survived better....
Logged

ShaunDoe

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5
Re: 5 year sockeye
« Reply #8 on: September 07, 2010, 10:47:48 PM »

Not sure of the source but I heard that some systems had as high as 22% of the run being 5year old fish. More than normal, but not enough to create the abundance of fish reported to date.
Logged

ShaunDoe

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5
Re: 5 year sockeye
« Reply #9 on: September 07, 2010, 10:48:58 PM »

If so then they would be bigger average size

From what I've been told, the Pitt River sockeye generally are a larger fish.
Logged

Bently

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 500
  • fish eyes love my ties
Re: 5 year sockeye
« Reply #10 on: September 07, 2010, 11:05:11 PM »

What are the chances that they dont always return to their original river system?

 They found Fraser River fish in Port Alberni this year, that's what I was told anyway.
Logged