Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

British Columbia Sport & Outdoor Lounge => Sport Chat => Topic started by: THE_ROE_SLINGER on February 27, 2008, 11:29:39 PM

Title: Canucks
Post by: THE_ROE_SLINGER on February 27, 2008, 11:29:39 PM
Tough game tonight...Thought they played well..pettinger looks half decent..Hopefully we can get some offense outa him!
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: mastercaster on March 01, 2008, 03:56:10 PM
Talk about getting screwed by the refs!  How do two refs miss the high stick on Kessler at the start of overtime?  He was bleeding like a stucked pig!!  You'd think that one or both of them would be watching the puck being dropped.  Should have been a 4 minute powerplay which would have been a gimmee in OT.

Was at the game last night against the Blue Jackets....another disheartning loss!  Thought after they were up 2-0 and heading into the third it was money in the bank. Should have been 3 zip.  The refs screwed up calling back the first goal...Naslund getting called from interfering with the goalie was bogus...he was pushed from behind into Leclaire.

It was the defense that let them down.  Again!  The pairing of Mitchell and Bieksa doesn't seem to have the same chemistry of last year...hopefully a few more games under their belt will be the ticket.
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: Fish Assassin on March 01, 2008, 05:44:24 PM
Talk about getting screwed by the refs!  How do two refs miss the high stick on Kessler at the start of overtime?  He was bleeding like a stucked pig!!  You'd think that one or both of them would be watching the puck being dropped.  Should have been a 4 minute powerplay which would have been a gimmee in OT.


Was one of the referees named Mick McGough ? An appropriate name for a ref. ;D
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: mojoman on March 02, 2008, 01:53:55 PM
Talk about getting screwed by the refs!  How do two refs miss the high stick on Kessler at the start of overtime?  He was bleeding like a stucked pig!!  You'd think that one or both of them would be watching the puck being dropped.  Should have been a 4 minute powerplay which would have been a gimmee in OT.


Was one of the referees named Mick McGough ? An appropriate name for a ref. ;D


so its only when the canuks lose there is a prob with the refs?????..... :D :D :D :D :D



mojo
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: kingpin on March 02, 2008, 02:33:22 PM
4-1 blackhawks, 27-10 are the shots.. good game nucks :D nice run on toews too. ::)
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: chris gadsden on March 02, 2008, 02:40:13 PM
4-1 blackhawks, 27-10 are the shots.. good game nucks :D nice run on toews too. ::)
Time to replace another GM. ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: GoldHammeredCroc on March 02, 2008, 02:47:00 PM
Garbage effort today.  I'm hoping not, but I wouldn't be surprised to see the Playoffs slip out of our reach this year.
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: Fish Assassin on March 02, 2008, 03:40:38 PM
No need to abandon the ship. Last I looked the Canucks are tied for 8th and the Laughs are in 12th place in their division. Time to shine those golf clubs. Golf Leaves Golf :D
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: mastercaster on March 02, 2008, 04:29:19 PM
4-1 blackhawks, 27-10 are the shots.. good game nucks :D nice run on toews too. ::)

Peddinger might have run him, somewhat, but it wouldn't have gotten called if there hadn't been the fight.  Neither ref had their hand up.  Both guys had their sticks up and after viewing the replay a few times  (since I was taping the game as I watched it) it was Toews own stick that cut him when he tried to protect himself from the hit.  I guess Peddinger could only stomach seeing the Sedins getting dumped on their collective butts so may times before he felt it was time to rough up one of their big guns.

All in all... a poor game for the Nuks....over confidence maybe what with 9 rookies in the game.  Vancouver WILL rectify the situation in Colorado and play with a lot more urgency...something that was sadly lacking in today's game against Rockport...make that Chicago.
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: kingpin on March 02, 2008, 06:35:39 PM
did not watch the full game.. but pettinger imo was charging and it looked like his hands were up so correct me if im wrong.
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: mastercaster on March 02, 2008, 10:12:40 PM
did not watch the full game.. but pettinger imo was charging and it looked like his hands were up so correct me if im wrong.

Like I said both of them had their sticks up but it was Toew's stick that did the damage.  Of course it was helped along with Pettinger's.
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: mojoman on March 03, 2008, 03:05:22 PM
Towes got 40 stitches....yeah,....just a lil' bump.... :D :D :D



mojo read my sig
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: CHUMHUNTER on March 03, 2008, 03:11:47 PM
Canucks looked awful yesterday. They are weaker with Cooke gone not that I was much of a Cooke fan but they are lacking a great deal now. Pettinger at least fought and I think got more out of the penalties than he should have. Hit looked clean to me. Av's tomorrow night and they are hurting. Forsberg may play. Leafs are looking  better thank goodness. Sundin has been awesome last 2 games. Long way to the playoffs and having been a Leaf fan for 50 years I do remember what they are like.
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: salmon river on March 03, 2008, 04:11:11 PM
They are one game under 500 if you count OT/SO losses.

I know the playoffs are another season but is their realistically any hope getting past the first round?
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: chris gadsden on March 03, 2008, 04:37:02 PM
Leafs are looking  better thank goodness. Sundin has been awesome last 2 games. Long way to the playoffs and having been a Leaf fan for 50 years I do remember what they are like.
Nice to have you aboard, I think we have more Leaf fans here now but of course many are bailing on the team from Vancouver now. ;D ;D ;D

Sundin voted #1 player in the league for last week, got to love it. ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: Fish Assassin on March 03, 2008, 06:09:26 PM
Go Leafs Go ! What a grate team we have  ;D






Must stop eating these mushrooms. ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: chris gadsden on March 03, 2008, 07:36:29 PM
Garbage effort today.  I'm hoping not, but I wouldn't be surprised to see the Playoffs slip out of our reach this year.
They could have used "The Cooker" as he got 3 points tonight.
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: mojoman on March 04, 2008, 06:14:44 AM
Go Leafs Go ! What a grate team we have  ;D






Must stop eating these mushrooms. ;D ;D ;D


ahhhh...the sweet sound of a Knucklehead realizing the holy grail of hockey ain't comin'...but you wouldn't have known it at christmas time.... :D :D :D



mojo
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: CHUMHUNTER on March 04, 2008, 12:48:31 PM
Sundin is #1. Good luck to the Canucks tonight. Sure getting burned on the radio right now. Those guys still making a big deal about Louongo's four letter word last week. At least he was telling the truth and not giving evereybody the pat lines. Hey Chris looks like we have lots of Leaf wanna bee's on this post.
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: mojoman on March 06, 2008, 06:30:58 AM
where have all the Canuk posters gone
long time missing
did they fall outta the race
2 days ago....
the answer my friend is blowing in the wind
the playoffs are blowing in the wind




 ;D ;D ;D ;D


mojo


Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: Fish Assassin on March 06, 2008, 12:34:51 PM
I was thinking the same thing about Leaf Deflation. If you're a Toronto fan, you know tough. ;D
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: mojoman on March 06, 2008, 03:37:44 PM
c'mon FA....your fellow Cannots fans may get a tad upset if ya stick with the same lines year in year out...at least I tried to mix it up....oh...forgot...you follow a team with no imagination...explains it all....lol...




mojo ;D
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: Fish Assassin on March 06, 2008, 04:16:14 PM
c'mon FA....your fellow Cannots fans may get a tad upset if ya stick with the same lines year in year out...at least I tried to mix it up....oh...forgot...you follow a team with no imagination...explains it all....lol...




mojo ;D

This coming from a guy who is still living in the last century. 1967 ;D ;D
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: mojoman on March 06, 2008, 06:36:08 PM
c'mon FA....your fellow Cannots fans may get a tad upset if ya stick with the same lines year in year out...at least I tried to mix it up....oh...forgot...you follow a team with no imagination...explains it all....lol...




mojo ;D

This coming from a guy who is still living in the last century. 1967 ;D ;D


and how long has it been since the Cannots last cup....oops...sorry...I forgot....ZERO.... :D :D :D




mojo
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: Fish Assassin on March 06, 2008, 07:47:28 PM


and how long has it been since the Cannots last cup....oops...sorry...I forgot....ZERO.... :D :D :D


Using the same old argument. Perhaps you can take a little of your own advice and come up with a new line. How many times have the Make Beliefs made it to the finals since 1967....oh I forgot.....NONE ;D ;D
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: kingpin on March 06, 2008, 08:02:05 PM
no i think your using the same old argument FA.... the canucks are so bad, the leafs have been playin better lately.
Title: Re: Canucks
Post by: skibumAB on March 25, 2008, 08:44:09 PM
Another tough game tonight

GO FLAMES GO