Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Federal Court of Appeal quashes construction approvals for Trans Mountain  (Read 4088 times)

IronNoggin

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1772
  • Any River... Any Time....

So, Trans Mountain is once again a No-Go.
In the decision released Thursday, and written by Justice Eleanor Dawson, the court found the National Energy Board's assessment of the project was so flawed that it should not have been relied on by the federal cabinet when it gave final approval to proceed in November 2016.

A shame Pierre's Idiot Child saddled us with ownership of this extremely expensive liability...

Guess Alberta will once again boycott our wine...

While all the rest of Canada ponies up for True Dummy's bills...

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/tasker-trans-mountain-federal-court-appeals-1.4804495

Nog
     

Logged

Novabonker

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1447

Idiot Trudeau or Simpleton Scheer who was utterly incompetent as hoc speaker. Don't  even get me started on the idiot Harper. The whole lot make me wretch with disgust.
Logged
http://

IronNoggin

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1772
  • Any River... Any Time....
Re: Federal Court of Appeal quashes construction approvals for Trans Mountain
« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2018, 11:44:27 AM »

Rex Murphy: How much more can Canadians ask Alberta to take?

If cars and trains and planes could run on green sanctimony, in the age of Justin Trudeau, Canada would be Kuwait. But of course they don’t. And in Save the Auto Pact week, which is how I would characterize Chrystia Freeland’s frantic return from Europe and Ukraine to Washington, to answer Mr. Trump’s summons and catch up with her Mexican “partners,” who would have guessed that a federal court would shoot a thunderbolt at the industry that allows all those cars to do what cars do in the first place?

Poor battered Fort McMurray — what’s left for them after fire, flood, world prices and a court’s curt quash? A plague of frogs and locusts and perhaps an eclipse of the sun, just for variety.

This careless government has careened from one bungle and self-manufactured crisis to another. From India, to Saudi Arabia, to Washington this week, it’s either catch-up, incompetence or peacock risibility. And as Ms. Freeland and her team pulled sophomore “all-nighters” to save free trade and appease the angry god in the White House, dear Alberta learned there was no way they will be able to trade their oil whatever way NAFTA goes.

For the pipeline, the pipeline we had to buy because Canadians didn’t support it correctly in the first place, is now on hold, which is Liberalese for “you will not see this in your lifetime.” Finance Minister Bill Morneau extended the novel explanation that the decision was a good thing, which raised questions on just which asteroid he was reporting from. Catherine McKenna, minister of climate change, still on the straw crusade, had less or nothing to say, apart from a dart at Doug Ford — which is her latest Twitter hobby — even as a much disappointed Rachel Notley (finally) in principle abandoned co-operation with federal carbon plans.

Ms. Freeland may or may not save the Canadian bacon in Washington — it’s unclear as I write. But the mess that has fallen on Canadian politics, and provincial relations, emphatically those with Alberta, though other provinces are closely involved, as a result of the guillotining of the Trans Mountain pipeline, will not swiftly or easily be repaired. It is a massive fail. The strains and contests it will inspire within this happy Confederation will be compelling as any distempers with deal-maker Trump.

How was it then, that Alberta got shafted once again? And how many of the “slings and arrows of outrageous” greenism can or will Alberta take?

To begin at the beginning, you cannot placate the implacable. The dynamic between those who want an oil and gas industry, and the groups ideologically possessed to oppose one, is that the latter have one position and one position only: to end oil and gas in Canada. Whenever greens or their myriad fronts offer a mid-point position, a compromise, it is merely mouth-work, a moving of the lips for tactical reasons or spurious manoeuvre.

Those who harbour (or once did — Rachel Notley) the idea that there is a middle ground with green and global warming totalism, their dead-ender commitment to world-scale, Paris-stamped, UN-mustered global greenism — have simply not been watching or listening. Green environmentalism is fundamentalist. The government in Ottawa, both by disposition and ideologically, is far more to the green side of the world than it is or ever will be to its own and Alberta’s oil and gas industry. Paris before Calgary, “as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be.”

From the first day in office, to the present minute, when has there been just one full speech in any national or international forum when Mr. Trudeau, with that great dramatic gravity of his, made the real case for Canada’s oil and gas? Where have been the delegations led by him to showcase the Fort McMurray oil sands, to highlight the advanced technology, praise the engineering, sit down with the workers, meet the municipal leaders? In all the causes he really supports, he leads the parade and adds the precious glitter of his presence.

The consequence of all this nothing — nothing is a force — is that the demonstrations and protests and international gang-ups on Fort McMurray and the oilsands have been unanswered. That an atmosphere has been produced in which the case for Alberta has to be made, every time afresh, and from an established negative baseline. The “antis” have had the stage unopposed, indeed given tacit sanction, the negatives allowed to snowball. Indigenous opposition blares in every press report. Indigenous support an afterthought and a whisper.

These are the atmospherics in which decisions are made: a structured and long-nourished hostility toward the idea of oil and gas energy; an unexamined moral supremacy afforded opposition to energy projects; an eagerness to display concert with those “fighting” for Nature and all her handiworks; an embedded predisposing to overlook the “mundane” concern for jobs and those who haven’t got them; a total indisposition to inquire into either the funding or motivation of organizations whose raison d’etre is protest and obstruction coupled with an overwhelming disposition to see only greed and rapacity on the industry side. This in the mindset, the mentality, in which current progressive thought is fixed, and it is in the ascendant. It is, most fatally, the mindset of the Trudeau government, whose concern for its environmentalist credentials and its thirst for the admiration of global progressive voices is its deepest political emotion.

What chance has a hinterland town like Fort McMurray against this array? Those who think that “environmental review” is about reviewing the environment have lost the plot. In our new green world the purpose of environmental review is to extend the time and space for opposition to invent new objections, and invite fresh protests. The process, as it is lovingly called, is always more important than the project. The thing reviewed is always less significant than the review itself.

The infatuation with process and the counterfeit search for social licence — the theatre of moralist environmentalism — will always trump the plain common sense of the demands of a purposeful national economy. It will always give glancing afterthought to the common experience of people working or looking to do so, to projects that vitalize communities, and keep alive the spirit of individual and collective enterprise that has always attended “doing an honest day’s work for an honest dollar.”

Thus this week’s court decision was neither singular nor defining. It was just one more stammer in a long pattern of stammering, the latest rock on the road, one fortified by the mentality that governs the long-prevalent bias against this one industry, the dismissal of “Albertan” concerns as always secondary to more “principled” ones, and just another thread in an extremely well-woven tapestry.

Underwriting this suffocating octopus of intervention and delay is the famous axiom uttered by a yet-to-be prime minister: “Governments can grant permits; only communities can grant permission.” That line, like so many other of his mini-thoughts on complex issues, has brought a harvest of faction, and offers a straight line to the latest bad news for Alberta this week.

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/rex-murphy-how-much-more-can-canadians-ask-alberta-to-take

Yep!
Nog
Logged

Blood_Orange

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 645
Re: Federal Court of Appeal quashes construction approvals for Trans Mountain
« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2018, 01:26:46 PM »

Oh, Rex Murphy. He used to be a pretty good journalist at the CBC. He did a great job with the Cross-Country Checkup radio show. Then he started doing paid speaking engagements at oil and gas conferences and turned his newspaper journalism into industry cheerleading pieces. That's fine for him but I don't believe that he should be able to continue to pose as a journalist if he's using his newspaper platform to lobby the public.

He's the headline speaker at this year's Oil Sands Trade Show in Fort McMurray on Sept 12, 2018.
https://energynow.ca/2018/07/rex-murphy-to-headline-oil-sands-trade-show/
Logged

IronNoggin

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1772
  • Any River... Any Time....
Re: Federal Court of Appeal quashes construction approvals for Trans Mountain
« Reply #4 on: September 01, 2018, 01:31:07 PM »

Doesn't negate a single thing he has to say above. Period.

Nog
Logged

GordJ

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 302
Re: Federal Court of Appeal quashes construction approvals for Trans Mountain
« Reply #5 on: September 01, 2018, 05:57:54 PM »

Oh, Rex Murphy. He used to be a pretty good journalist at the CBC. He did a great job with the Cross-Country Checkup radio show. Then he started doing paid speaking engagements at oil and gas conferences and turned his newspaper journalism into industry cheerleading pieces. That's fine for him but I don't believe that he should be able to continue to pose as a journalist if he's using his newspaper platform to lobby the public.

He's the headline speaker at this year's Oil Sands Trade Show in Fort McMurray on Sept 12, 2018.
https://energynow.ca/2018/07/rex-murphy-to-headline-oil-sands-trade-show/
You can’t take his credentials away just because you disagree with him—- unless you’re the president.
Logged

Blood_Orange

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 645
Re: Federal Court of Appeal quashes construction approvals for Trans Mountain
« Reply #6 on: September 01, 2018, 11:03:12 PM »

Doesn't negate a single thing he has to say above. Period.

Nog

Why not?
Logged

IronNoggin

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1772
  • Any River... Any Time....
Re: Federal Court of Appeal quashes construction approvals for Trans Mountain
« Reply #7 on: September 02, 2018, 10:48:55 AM »

Justin Trudeau has been hoisted with his own pipeline
By Tim HarperNational Affairs Columnist
Thu., Aug. 30, 2018

It’s a rare — perhaps unprecedented — day when so many government priorities come crashing down or are badly bruised with one court decision.

That was the case Thursday for the Justin Trudeau government when a Federal Court of Appeal brought the expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline on the British Columbia coast to a screeching halt.

This cost the Liberals on questions about their government’s economic stewardship, its vaunted Indigenous reconciliation, its climate strategy and the competence of the federal cabinet.

And now we all each own a piece of an aging, $4.5-billion pipeline, a bunch of blueprints and a pile of downed tools.

In a stunning confluence of events, the court overturned the National Energy Board and cabinet approval of the Trudeau pipeline expansion on the same day that shareholders with Kinder Morgan, no doubt with huge grins on their face, washed their hands of the project and gave it — lock, stock and legal headache — to the prime minister and Canadian taxpayers.

Even if it only delays the project, the court decision will mean a bigger price tag for the taxpayer, and raise another red flag to foreign investors looking at Canada as a place to do business.

Trudeau had swooped in to buy the pipeline and vowed to forge ahead as a crucial quid pro quo of his national climate strategy. In return for Alberta Premier Rachel Notley’s provincial carbon pricing plan, Trudeau had vowed to get her bitumen to Asian markets, off the coast of Burnaby, B.C.

Jobs were to be created, Notley would have a victory to take to voters in next year’s provincial election, and Trudeau would continue to have a climate ally in a key province.

That is all now in limbo. Notley remains landlocked, and that figure in her rearview mirror is the anti-carbon-tax Jason Kenney.

It also must pain a government that has hung so much of its credibility on Indigenous reconciliation to be told by a court that its consultation with Indigenous communities concerned about this expansion amounted to little more than note-taking.

“The government of Canada was required to engage in a considered, meaningful two-way dialogue,’’ the court said in its decision. “However, for the most part, Canada’s representatives limited their mandate to listening to and recording the concerns of the Indigenous applicants and then transmitting those concerns to the decision-makers.”

Dustin Rivers of the Squamish Nation cut to the core, saying the Trudeau government’s “rhetoric around reconciliation has been deemed flawed based on this court decision.”

The court also raised questions about the governing diligence of Trudeau and his cabinet.

Trudeau himself called the NEB review of the Trans Mountain expansion he inherited from Stephen Harper flawed, and he moved to gather more public input and launched further consultations with Indigenous communities affected by the project.

But it was the equivalent of putting a bandage on a gaping wound and ultimately, the cabinet signed off on something it should not have, the court ruled. The NEB review was so flawed, the court said, that the cabinet had no right to use it as a basis to green-light the project.

They approved a project that did not take into account increased tanker traffic as a result of the expansion, a point repeatedly driven home by opponents.

The court floated one lifeline to the government, saying Indigenous concerns are specific and focused, so consultation with them can be “brief and efficient.”

But proper Indigenous consultation could result in proper reasons to kill it. A hard look at the environmental effects of tanker traffic off the coast of Burnaby could also lead to reasons to deep-six the expansion.

And “brief” is rarely used in the same sentence as “environmental assessment” and “Indigenous consultation.”

In the upside-down-world of government messaging, Finance Minister Bill Morneau said the court justified the government’s purchase of the pipeline expansion project in the first place, because only the government has the wherewithal to “de-risk” the project.

Morneau said the government moved in because it saw the risks and it will double down, formally closing the deal with Kinder Morgan as early as Friday and taking the court’s prescribed path to do right on the environment and consultation, get the expansion going and then try to sell it back to the private sector.

He really has no option. But the Liberals must hope they can find a way to “de-risk” this project before it becomes part of a highly risky bid for re-election.

Oh, to be a Kinder Morgan shareholder.

Woe to be a Canadian taxpayer.

https://www.thestar.com/opinion/star-columnists/2018/08/30/justin-trudeau-is-hoist-with-his-own-pipeline.html

Cheers,
Nog
Logged

RalphH

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4856
    • Initating Salmon Fry
Re: Federal Court of Appeal quashes construction approvals for Trans Mountain
« Reply #8 on: September 07, 2018, 12:22:35 PM »

Oh, Rex Murphy. He used to be a pretty good journalist at the CBC. He did a great job with the Cross-Country Checkup radio show. Then he started doing paid speaking engagements at oil and gas conferences and turned his newspaper journalism into industry cheerleading pieces. That's fine for him but I don't believe that he should be able to continue to pose as a journalist if he's using his newspaper platform to lobby the public.

He's the headline speaker at this year's Oil Sands Trade Show in Fort McMurray on Sept 12, 2018.
https://energynow.ca/2018/07/rex-murphy-to-headline-oil-sands-trade-show/

you gotta remember that over half of Rex's extended family lives and works in Fort McMurray. Sort of like 'Nog makes his living catching salmon out of the Ukee etc etc....follow the money honey flows both directions.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2018, 08:15:55 AM by RalphH »
Logged
"Two things are infinite, the Universe and human stupidity... though I am not completely sure about the Universe" ...Einstein as related to F.S. Perls.