Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: NHL Smack Talk 10-11  (Read 64289 times)

Sandman

  • Subscriber
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1329
Re: NHL Smack Talk 10-11
« Reply #735 on: March 28, 2011, 08:00:41 PM »

In other news the Flamers are not helping their own cause for the post season. Losing right now to the lowly Oilers 4-2. Flamers have played more games than the teams they are chasing and after tonight they will have played 3 more games than the 8th place Hawks.

How bout the characterc of those red hot flames coming back with a big win!

Another team i know in the NW (Casucks) in that situation down 4-2 would have rolled over and .... Tongue Tongue Tongue I look forward to the casucks first round exit!

The Canucks are 3-11-3 when trailing after 2 periods, the Flames are 2-14-1.  I'll put my money on the Canucks.
Logged
Not all those who wander are lost

rhino

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 832
Re: NHL Smack Talk 10-11
« Reply #736 on: March 28, 2011, 08:22:16 PM »

thats not so great for a team thats supposed to take you to the promise land.Doesnt matter where you put your money. you will lose it. Specially o the casucks wining more then one playoff round. :D :D
Logged

Sandman

  • Subscriber
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1329
Re: NHL Smack Talk 10-11
« Reply #737 on: March 28, 2011, 10:27:16 PM »

thats not so great for a team thats supposed to take you to the promise land.Doesnt matter where you put your money. you will lose it. Specially o the casucks wining more then one playoff round. :D :D

What I get out of that stat is this:

Out of 76 games played the Canucks have only trailed 17 times after 2 periods (22%) and only lost 11 of those (14%).  Given there is room to lose 43% of the games in the playoff (3 of 7 games), that is not a bad stat at all.  This goes nice with the stat that shows the Canucks 35-0-3 when leading after 2 periods.  What a great team we have!
Logged
Not all those who wander are lost

chris gadsden

  • Subscriber
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11518
Re: NHL Smack Talk 10-11
« Reply #738 on: March 29, 2011, 06:39:42 PM »

Well what can one say, just when they say we are done we get an easy win over the Sabres tonight.  ;D ;D ;D What a team we are once again. ;D

bbronswyk2000

  • Subscriber
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3849
  • Not affilaiated with any club.....
Re: NHL Smack Talk 10-11
« Reply #739 on: March 29, 2011, 07:28:33 PM »

Well what can one say, just when they say we are done we get an easy win over the Sabres tonight.  ;D ;D ;D What a team we are once again. ;D

Just delaying the inevitable. On more important news the Canucks are the WESTERN CONFERENCE CHAMPIONS!!! Beating the Preds 3-1. They now have 111 points WOW what a great team we have!! Nobody is better than the Canucks!!

Oh and Laughs suck!!!
Logged


Belong to the "4 F Club"
Fishing, Football, Fitness and Family

Fish Assassin

  • Subscriber
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9965
Re: NHL Smack Talk 10-11
« Reply #740 on: March 29, 2011, 07:57:06 PM »

Well what can one say, just when they say we are done we get an easy win over the Sabres tonight.  ;D ;D ;D What a team we are once again. ;D

Canuck playoff tickets go on sale this Saturday. When are the Laughs' going on sale ? ;D
Logged

TayC

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 188
  • Scott Howells Moustache
Re: NHL Smack Talk 10-11
« Reply #741 on: March 29, 2011, 08:00:22 PM »

. On more important news the Canucks are the WESTERN CONFERENCE CHAMPIONS!!! Beating the Preds 3-1. They now have 111 points WOW what a great team we have!! Nobody is better than the Canucks!!

Oh and Laughs suck!!!

x2!!
Logged
A swung fly is the best fly.

rhino

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 832
Re: NHL Smack Talk 10-11
« Reply #742 on: March 29, 2011, 08:27:11 PM »

Well what can one say, just when they say we are done we get an easy win over the Sabres tonight.  ;D ;D ;D What a team we are once again. ;D
ROLLING,ROLLING ROLLING....
GO LEAFS! ;D ;D ;D
Logged

Sandman

  • Subscriber
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1329
Re: NHL Smack Talk 10-11
« Reply #743 on: March 29, 2011, 08:41:51 PM »

x2!!

And what was that?  Another come from behind win? 4-11-3 when trailing after 2!  Improving in all areas. 

ROLLING,ROLLING ROLLING....

Logged
Not all those who wander are lost

noxcape

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 416
Re: NHL Smack Talk 10-11
« Reply #744 on: March 29, 2011, 09:10:57 PM »

looks like the black hawks are smacking there lips to watch another cansucks fisrt round bye

Fish Assassin

  • Subscriber
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9965
Re: NHL Smack Talk 10-11
« Reply #745 on: March 29, 2011, 09:18:47 PM »

looks like the black hawks are smacking there lips to watch another cansucks fisrt round bye

Glad to see you're following Canada's team ;D Will you be joining the Grief golf tour starting next week ?
Logged

Stratocaster

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 599
Re: NHL Smack Talk 10-11
« Reply #746 on: March 29, 2011, 11:42:42 PM »

looks like the black hawks are smacking there lips to watch another cansucks fisrt round bye

Another first round bye?  You do know the canucks got through the first round the last couple of years don't you?  Oh yeah the concept of cheering for a team in the playoffs seem foreign to you since the leafs haven't even had a sniff for the last 5 years!  And it looks like it will be 6 in a row!

Season GP W L OTL Pts GF GA PIM Finish Playoffs
2005–06 82 41 33 8 90 257 270 1291 4th, Northeast Did not qualify
2006–07 82 40 31 11 91 258 269 1065 3rd, Northeast Did not qualify
2007–08 82 36 35 11 83 231 260 1087 5th, Northeast Did not qualify
2008–09 82 34 35 13 81 250 293 1113 5th, Northeast Did not qualify
2009–10 82 30 38 14 74 214 267 1091 5th, Northeast Did not qualify

Pathetic record, pathetic team.

Its even worse considering that they play in the weak Eastern Conference.



delusion definition
de·lu·sion (di lo̵̅o̅′z̸hən)
noun
1. a deluding or being deluded
2. a false belief or opinion
3. Psychiatry a false, persistent belief maintained in spite of evidence to the contrary
4. A Toronto Maple Leaf Fan's thought's about their team making the playoffs


Rolling Rolling Rolling................................................................................................gutter ball!
« Last Edit: March 30, 2011, 09:25:24 AM by Stratocaster »
Logged

Sandman

  • Subscriber
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1329
Re: NHL Smack Talk 10-11
« Reply #747 on: March 30, 2011, 01:11:29 AM »

the leafs haven't even had a sniff for the last 5 years!  And it looks like it will be 6 in a row!

Season GP W L OTL Pts GF GA PIM Finish Playoffs
2005–06 82 41 33 8 90 257 270 1291 4th, Northeast Did not qualify
2006–07 82 40 31 11 91 258 269 1065 3rd, Northeast Did not qualify
2007–08 82 36 35 11 83 231 260 1087 5th, Northeast Did not qualify
2008–09 82 34 35 13 81 250 293 1113 5th, Northeast Did not qualify
2009–10 82 30 38 14 74 214 267 1091 5th, Northeast Did not qualify

The Canucks on the other hand

2003-04 -- lost to Calgary, 4-3, Western Conf. quarterfinals (A first round loss to the Flames who would go on to play in the Stanley Cup in the Finals)
2005-06 -- missed the playoffs (The Flames lost in the first round, despite winning their Division, to Anaheim)
2006-07 -- defeated Dallas, 4-3, Western Conf. quarterfinals  (Flames lost in the first round to Detroit)
                lost to Anaheim, 4-1, Western Conf. semifinals  (Anaheim went on to win the Stanley Cup) so we played in the Stanley Cup Final...just a few rounds early
2007-08 -- missed the playoffs  (Flames lost in the first round to the Sharks)
2008-09 -- defeated St. Louis, 4-0, Western Conf. quarterfinals   (Flames lost in the first round to Chicago)
                lost to Chicago, 4-2, Western Conf. semifinals   
2009-10 -- defeated LA Kings, 4-2 Western Conf. quarterfinals (Flames missed the playoffs)
                 lost to Chicago, 4-2, Western Conf. semifinals   (Chicago went on to win the Stanley Cup) so again we played in the Stanley Cup Final...just a few rounds early

So let's recap. 
Since 2005  Playoff appearances    First round losses   Second round losses
Leafs                  0                              0                           0
Flames                4                              4                           0
Canucks              3                              0                           3   (2 losses to the eventual Stanley Cup Champions)

Do you really want to play a game of "who sucks more"?
Logged
Not all those who wander are lost

TrophyHunter

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2142
  • V.P. Club S.C. & P. & S.C. & F. Team Hop Sing
    • BB Pics
Re: NHL Smack Talk 10-11
« Reply #748 on: March 30, 2011, 11:39:06 AM »

HAHAHAHAHA !! those are some well thought out and well put together posts !!

Just remember that Laugh Fans and Flamer Fans are delusional !! its like arguing with a woman... you cannot win ! even when they know they are wrong they will make stuff up to make them feel better about themselves, everybody knows in their hearts that the Canuck's are the most dominating team the NHL has seen since the Bettman parity years

I have a really good feeling about this team, they have proven all year how deep they are and how resilient they are, and I feel really good about the fact that if Lou starts out with a couple of bad games we have the best backup goalie in the league to carry on ..

Canucks for the Cup baby !!!!!!!!

TH
Logged


...oooO..............
...(....).....Oooo...
....\..(.......(...)....
.....\_).......)../.....
...............(_/......
... RICK WAS ......
....... HERE..........


XG Flosses with his Spey !!

noxcape

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 416
Re: NHL Smack Talk 10-11
« Reply #749 on: March 30, 2011, 01:14:53 PM »

we are delisional thats to funny  you guys keep dremaing aobut 94

the leafs on the other hand have finally taken a turn for the future