Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Ending the Wasteful Long-gun Registry, In 3 Days  (Read 9323 times)

chris gadsden

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13878
Ending the Wasteful Long-gun Registry, In 3 Days
« on: November 02, 2009, 07:03:38 PM »

 


Received this a few minutes ago. ;D ;D

 
Mark it on your calendar and pay close attention to this one.  November 4th is going to be a big day on Parliament Hill.  Here's why:

Every federal Member of Parliament, provided they are not a Minister in the government, is allowed to propose bills for Parliament to consider, debate, and eventually vote on.  They're called private Members’ bills, and they could be on any subject matter.  Ideally, they want to choose a subject that is consistent with their party's platform or perhaps something they have always championed.  While only a few of them ever pass into law, it is possible to do so when all the parliamentary stars line up.  Such a moment may be happening on November 4th, when a vote on Conservative MP Candice Hoeppner's bill to abolish the wasteful long gun registry takes place.

The last time we dealt with this issue, Parliament voted on whether or not to extend the 'amnesty' on the fees associated with the registry.  While members of the Conservative government continue to stand up for long-gun owners, some opposition members continue to demonstrate that they just don't get it.  NDP MP Nathan Cullen has actually criticized our Government's amnesty program for saving gun owners millions of dollars in fees!

This time it appears Ms. Hoeppner's bill has a chance to make it through the system.  Though only the Conservatives have campaigned against the registry, there are several MPs from other political parties who are also on the public record opposing it.  The handful of NDP and Liberal MPs from rural parts of Canada understand just how unpopular it is, so in order to get elected they 'promised' that they wanted it abolished.  On November 4th they'll get their chance to put their vote where their mouth is.  What will they do?

A couple of them have tipped their hand.  NDP MP Charlie Angus simply hates anything to do with the Conservatives and has said he'll vote neither yes nor no.  I assume he'll abstain or simply not show up for the vote.  I love his principled position!  Liberal MP Larry Bagnell from the Yukon seems to be leaning towards support which, having spoken to many Yukoners myself, doesn't surprise me.  We only need a few of them to vote as they promised in the last campaign, and it will go through to the Committee stage.

I'm hoping that Parliament's minority status may actually help us on this issue.  Since these wavering MPs know that they may have to answer to their voters in an election that could come within months, they may be paying more attention to the folks at home than they are to the Liberal, NDP, and Bloc leaders who want them to simply do as they're told.  We'll see.

If we win the vote on November 4th, it will be step one in abolishing one of the most expensive, least effective government programs I've ever seen.  There are so many better ways to use a billion dollars; from tax relief to law enforcement.  Keep your eye on this one and I'll let you know how it goes.

Min

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 52
Re: Ending the Wasteful Long-gun Registry, In 3 Days
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2009, 07:20:43 PM »

I don't know if it does any good, but, I wrote to my MP.  I mentioned the Bill and encouraged him to support it.
Who knows?  Every little bit helps?
Logged

Bassonator

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 659
Re: Ending the Wasteful Long-gun Registry, In 3 Days
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2009, 08:11:43 PM »

Its about time.....hated it since day one......no matter what the law is...bad guys will always get there guns.
Logged
Take the T out of Morton.

chris gadsden

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13878
Re: Ending the Wasteful Long-gun Registry, In 3 Days
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2009, 05:55:44 PM »

MPs vote to scrap long-gun registry
   The federal long-gun registry moved a step closer to begin abolished
   as MPs voted Wednesday to scrap the controversial program. With
   support from some Liberal and NDP MPs, the private member's bill
   passed second reading by a vote of 164 to 137, sending it to
   committee.

chris gadsden

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13878
Re: Ending the Wasteful Long-gun Registry, In 3 Days
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2009, 05:57:40 PM »

House takes step toward repeal of gun registryMPs vote 164-137 to give 'approval-in principle' to a bill that calls for the repeal of legal requirements to register long-barrelled rifles and shotgunsComment on this story »
Tonda MacCharles
 Ottawa Bureau Published 57 minutes agoEmail Print Republish Add to Favourites Report an error Share Share  Article
 Comments (33) OTTAWA –A long-running effort by the Conservatives to kill the long-gun registry has passed an important hurdle in the House of Commons, with a majority voting for the first time in 14 years to study a bill to repeal it.

MPs voted 164-137 to give "second reading" — or "approval-in-principle" - to a private member's bill sponsored by MP Candice Hoeppner (Portage-Lisgar) that calls for the repeal of legal requirements to register long-barrelled rifles and shotguns.

12 NDP members, eight Liberals, and one independent MP voted with the 143 Conservatives.

The stage was set for the vote to pass hours earlier when Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff declared the current long-gun registry faces a crisis of "legitimacy" in rural Canada and needs to be overhauled.

Ignatieff said his caucus supports the "principle of gun control," and he personally believes it should include long guns. But he said the issue has divided urban and rural Canadians, and faces "resistance" in rural Canada.

He said his caucus is working on proposals to bridge that gap. In French, he suggested it could include "decriminalizing" the registration system for long guns.

Ignatieff said any Liberal changes would start with a "simple principle: we are for a firearms registration system that includes all firearms, but there is a problem of resistance in rural areas. It could be possible to decriminalize but to maintain a firearms registration system for long guns."

It was a Liberal government that enacted changes to the Criminal Code of Canada — in the wake of the 1989 Montreal massacre — and required Canadians to register their firearms including long-barrelled hunting rifles or shotguns.

Since 2006, the federal Conservatives brought in successive "amnesties" under the law and proposed government legislation to kill the registry — which has never been brought to a vote.

Instead it supported a private member's bill knowing votes on those are "freer" than on government bills.

Ignatieff and NDP leader Jack Layton's decisions to allow free votes by their caucus ensured Hoeppner's bill won the necessary votes to pass.

"The fundamental issue is to make sure we get a system of gun control which works both for rural Canada and for urban Canada," Ignatieff said.

"We want to listen to victims groups, sports hunters, legitimate gun owners to find a way to rebuild legitimacy for the gun registry in rural Canada. That's not a thing you can do overnight."

Ignatieff downplayed the impact of a Commons vote to give "second reading" to a private member's bill to repeal the registry.

"It's not the end of the firearms registration system tonight. It's only the beginning of a parliamentary process that will be pursued in committee and in the senate."

Wendy Cukier, president of the Coalition for Gun Control, watched the vote from the public gallery in the Commons and called it ``appalling."

"It wasn't even close," said the disgusted campaigner.

"It's horrifying and a lot of Canadians are going to wake up tomorrow and find out about this for the first time."

Meanwhile, the Conservative government continues to keep the latest report on the national firearms registry under wraps, even as MPs prepare to hold the vote on its future.

RCMP Commissioner William Elliott, who serves as the Commissioner of Firearms responsible for the gun registry, submitted the 2008 report to the federal government, but Peter Van Loan, the minister of public safety, has so far declined to table the report publicly in Parliament.

Van Loan told the Commons the report would be tabled eventually but that Canadians don't need "another report" to know the long gun registry "is very efficient at harassing law-abiding outdoor enthusiasts and farmers, and wasting money while being terribly inefficient at combating crime."

The vote late Wednesday now sends the bill to a committee for more study. It could die in committee, or be amended as long as changes adhere to the spirit of the bill. But generally, a bill that passes "second reading" may not be completely re-written to contradict its original intent.

The long-gun registry's supporters and its critics see the vote as an important step towards the registry's demise.

Quebec public safety minister Jacques Dupuis added his voice to those urging the federal Conservatives to maintain the registry, sending a letter directly to Van Loan.

After a heavy lobbying effort — including a Conservative-backed radio ad campaign targeting vulnerable Opposition ridings - Hoeppner (Portage-Lisgar) was confident she would get at least eight NDP and Liberal MPs to vote to get rid of the law.

Ignatieff and Layton personally opposed the bill, but cited their respective parties' "tradition" of free votes on private members' business.

Under Hoeppner's bill, longstanding controls on restricted handguns and prohibited weapons would remain, as would requirements that gun owners hold a valid license.

Hoeppner's bill doesn't specifically say that all the current data held on long-guns should be destroyed, but the government bill that proposed repealing the registry, currently languishing on the Senate's back-burner, does. And Hoeppner agrees that's what should happen.

In its 2007 report, the RCMP — which took over administration of the firearms centre in 2006 — states that the online firearms registry is "key to the safety of both police offers and the public, providing police with immediate access to the information they require in their investigations and operations."

The registry contains 11 years worth of data on 1.8 million licensed gun owners and 7.3 million firearms, including long-barrelled guns like hunting rifles and shotguns, as well as restricted handguns and prohibited weapons.

Information published on the RCMP's website rounds up the number of firearms, saying "there are an estimated 7.4 million firearms in Canada, about 1.2 million of which are restricted firearms (mostly handguns)."

However much of the other statistical information on the website related to firearms and violent crime rates or homicide is not up-to-date, but rather pre-dates the firearm registration regulations in Canada in 1998.

The RCMP reported that 2007 saw "better turnaround times" for licences and registrations, growing number of police queries of the firearms registry, and the use of new software that streamlined "production of notices to clients, court affidavits and other official documents."

"Overall, the Canadian Firearms Program was strengthened and woven more closely into the RCMP's National Police Services during 2007. It provided better service to law enforcement organizations, better service to licensing and registration clients, and was an important contributor to the RCMP's overall goal of 'safe homes, safe communities.' The RCMP is confident that 2008 will see continued progress in the priority areas," the report says.

It's not known what overview the 2008 report gives of the system and its operations

huntwriter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 163
    • Othmar Vohringer Outdoors
Re: Ending the Wasteful Long-gun Registry, In 3 Days
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2009, 07:51:18 AM »

That's the best news coming from the government in a very long time. From the day Harper took over I knew that he will do good on his promise, it was just a matter of time. For that he will get my vote any day. Finally legal gun owners are not treated anymore like potential criminals that must be kept under constant surveillance.   
Logged
Othmar Vohringer - Smart Hunting Strategies (SHS)
http://www.othmarvohringer.com/

marmot

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1213
Re: Ending the Wasteful Long-gun Registry, In 3 Days
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2009, 04:08:12 PM »

That's the best news coming from the government in a very long time. From the day Harper took over I knew that he will do good on his promise, it was just a matter of time. For that he will get my vote any day. Finally legal gun owners are not treated anymore like potential criminals that must be kept under constant surveillance.   

Treated like potential criminals?  Under "constant" surveillance?  I agree that the registry was useless....but those remarks just make you sound paranoid.  The point is that the registry did NOTHING but cost $$ and now that it's gone that money can be spent more responsibly.... how about victim services?
Logged

chris gadsden

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13878
Re: Ending the Wasteful Long-gun Registry, In 3 Days
« Reply #7 on: November 05, 2009, 09:05:52 PM »

I don't know if it does any good, but, I wrote to my MP.  I mentioned the Bill and encouraged him to support it.
Who knows?  Every little bit helps?
Yes it certainly is better than doing nothing. Thanks for taking the time to do this.

huntwriter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 163
    • Othmar Vohringer Outdoors
Re: Ending the Wasteful Long-gun Registry, In 3 Days
« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2009, 11:31:56 AM »

Treated like potential criminals?  Under "constant" surveillance?  I agree that the registry was useless....but those remarks just make you sound paranoid.  The point is that the registry did NOTHING but cost $$ and now that it's gone that money can be spent more responsibly.... how about victim services?

If your personal information is looked into a government computer and can be accessed any time by police, or hackers as has happened at least three times, for the sole purpose to look up information on what guns you own and how many and you think that is fine then that is your problem. I DID NOT LIKE IT.

BTW - About a year ago the police knocked on the door of one of my friends. Just to check up on him and his guns. Why? Because he purchased six guns in one week and that seemed a tad suspicious to the police. Where do you think they got that information. ;)
Logged
Othmar Vohringer - Smart Hunting Strategies (SHS)
http://www.othmarvohringer.com/

fishbuster

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 120
Re: Ending the Wasteful Long-gun Registry, In 3 Days
« Reply #9 on: November 23, 2009, 09:14:35 AM »

So I was reading in the Province the other day, it appears that the gun registration is done.  Is this a fact?  And if it is, do I still need to renew my possession only license?  Not sure if it's  part of the same thing.

Thanks
   
Logged

marmot

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1213
Re: Ending the Wasteful Long-gun Registry, In 3 Days
« Reply #10 on: November 23, 2009, 01:17:36 PM »

BTW - About a year ago the police knocked on the door of one of my friends. Just to check up on him and his guns. Why? Because he purchased six guns in one week and that seemed a tad suspicious to the police. Where do you think they got that information. ;)

They probably just asked him what was up and that was the end of it, right?  I suppose that's an affront to your rights though?  People would be complaining left right and center if that guy decided to go on a rampage and killed a bunch of people.  They'd cry "why didn't they do anything! They knew he had just purchased six guns."   It's obviously not "usual" for somebody to purchase that many guns at once, so they just checked to make sure everything was ok...what's the harm in that????
Also, if a hacker wants your information, they don't need to go to a gov't server to get it... there's a good chance that at one time or another you've had a keystroke logger on your own pc without even knowing it.

Logged

huntwriter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 163
    • Othmar Vohringer Outdoors
Re: Ending the Wasteful Long-gun Registry, In 3 Days
« Reply #11 on: December 10, 2009, 07:25:40 AM »


Also, if a hacker wants your information, they don't need to go to a gov't server to get it... there's a good chance that at one time or another you've had a keystroke logger on your own pc without even knowing it.



I don't know if I ever was hacked. But WE DO KNOW that the Gun Registry had been hacked at least four times.
Logged
Othmar Vohringer - Smart Hunting Strategies (SHS)
http://www.othmarvohringer.com/

marmot

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1213
Re: Ending the Wasteful Long-gun Registry, In 3 Days
« Reply #12 on: December 10, 2009, 11:56:40 AM »

I don't know if I ever was hacked. But WE DO KNOW that the Gun Registry had been hacked at least four times.

Thanks HW, i had no idea that had happened.  The gov't knowing where guns are is not a big deal to me, obviously criminals knowing is a big, big problem.  Its got my curiosity up...do you have any links by chance to articles about it?  I'd love to read more on it and if they caught whoever had hacked in.
Logged

huntwriter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 163
    • Othmar Vohringer Outdoors
Re: Ending the Wasteful Long-gun Registry, In 3 Days
« Reply #13 on: December 10, 2009, 04:57:35 PM »

marmot - It's been a while since the system was hacked but I did find this link that makes mention of it.
http://gunownersresource.com/gorole/index.php?title=Canadian_gun_registry
Logged
Othmar Vohringer - Smart Hunting Strategies (SHS)
http://www.othmarvohringer.com/