Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Fishing in British Columbia => The Fish Kitchen => Topic started by: bluenoser on October 19, 2009, 10:15:06 AM

Title: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: bluenoser on October 19, 2009, 10:15:06 AM
I bought a Little chief this year and have smoked several pink and a coho that was a bit dark but haven't smoked any chum.

A friend in Squamish gave me a standard for acceptable chum a few years back but I find it almost impossible to catch chum that meet that criteria any where but Squamish and chum has been closed the last couple years in Squamish.

His advice was only keep them if they have a pristine white belly, sea lice and silver appearance are a bonus.

In your experience what have you found acceptable for the smoker?

Thanks for any input.

Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: milo on October 21, 2009, 11:11:27 AM
I learned not long ago that "It's good for the smoker" is a lousy excuse used by people to justify harvesting less than desirable fish.

Simply put, what goes in comes out. If you feed the smoker junk (dark fish, long past its prime) the end result will be junk. If you smoke bright fish, with firm flesh and no visible degradation, the final result will be superb.

This is my standard for excellence when it comes to chum:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v131/milivoj/ChumDerby2009062.jpg)

That fish is obviously from the ocean, and some fish of that quality can be caught early in the season in the Squamish river (not this year, though - no retention for Chum is in place). In the Vedder it is very unlikely to get a chum that matches those caught in the ocean.

Another thing to consider: once salmon stop feeding, a male salmon is much better table fare than a female salmon. The female dispenses a lot more energy to nourish the eggs in its skeins - to the detriment of its flesh.

It baffles me to see some of the fish that people take home from the Vedder. Some of them I wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole. ::)


Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: Matt on October 21, 2009, 12:54:00 PM
Interesting about the male fish vs. female fish Milo.  I guess I'll have to take some males home too sometime, just to try them out.  Wait, that sounds really wrong.  ;D
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: fishseeker on October 21, 2009, 12:59:25 PM
I agree with this, I think, but I wouldn't completely dismiss a river caught chum as I learn t from my previous outing.  The one I got was definitely not as impressive as this beauty but it was only just starting to color - i.e still silver but starting to show those vertical blue bars.  In my opinion it was excellent. [...and it was a female too].  The texture was firm and flaky and the taste was mild - not stinky like a pink can get.  [Whenever I bring a pink home my wife douses it with a load of white wine just to eliminate the odor.  The chum did not require nearly as much].

I don't think I would ever keep one that has gone completely brown though.   I can only assume this one is even better than that.

...just my 2c.




Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: troutbreath on October 21, 2009, 02:24:39 PM
An old native guy netting spawny Chum at the mouth of the Harrison told me that the spawnier they were the less body fat so they didn't get rancid as fast when stored after being smoked. So take that boot home to smoke.
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: milo on October 21, 2009, 03:42:21 PM
I agree with this, I think, but I wouldn't completely dismiss a river caught chum as I learn t from my previous outing.  The one I got was definitely not as impressive as this beauty but it was only just starting to color - i.e still silver but starting to show those vertical blue bars.  In my opinion it was excellent. [...and it was a female too].  The texture was firm and flaky and the taste was mild - not stinky like a pink can get.  

Agreed, fishseeker. As long as the fish is still silver, the vertical bars mean nothing. They are often caught in the ocean like that, too, just before they head to the river. I will never forget my first silver river chum (Squamish 2004):

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v131/milivoj/FishingNovember2006008.jpg)

But when the chum turn greenish and the bars turn purple, they should be left to spawn. A fish like this I would never keep (but they can sure put up quite a fight!):

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v131/milivoj/colouredchum.jpg)

But I've seen people take home even worse looking fish. To each their own I guess.

Quote from: troutbreath
An old native guy netting spawny Chum at the mouth of the Harrison told me that the spawnier they were the less body fat so they didn't get rancid as fast when stored after being smoked. So take that boot home to smoke.

What he failed to tell you is that those chum are smoked for the dogs to eat during winter months.   ::)
So leave that boot in the river unless you have a fish eating dog.







Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: fishseeker on October 21, 2009, 10:01:03 PM
My thoughts exactly.  The first picture is exactly what I am talking about - got my first one like this last weekend with my nephew :)

..nice photos.
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: bluenoser on October 22, 2009, 02:18:58 PM
Milo thast ocean caught Chum is a beauty.

Thanks for the info on males vs females...another poster mentioned this to me as well....I'll keep looking for a clean male...now I sound like Matt.

I've never kept a chum caught in the Stave, seems that although they hit those purple and black jigs they have black bellies and purple sides to match. Caught a few over the years in the Vedder and the fraser which I've kept but the best has always been Squamish.

Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: dereke on October 22, 2009, 08:28:44 PM
Squamish 2009, gently released....needless to say would have been good for the smoker. My cleanest to date. ;D
(http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w216/derekerlandson/stampcoho002.jpg)

Milo that ocean fresh chummy is a beauty!
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: milo on October 23, 2009, 09:46:11 AM
Dereke, that's an absolutely gorgeous doe.
So, the good ole Squamish seems to be picking up...maybe I should pay it a visit this weekend.
C&R only means no crowds...hmmm....I like it.

One quick pointer, if you don't mind.
Did you fish above or below the M.?

Interesting about the male fish vs. female fish Milo.  I guess I'll have to take some males home too sometime, just to try them out.  Wait, that sounds really wrong.  ;D

LOL, Matt!  ;D
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: dennisK on October 23, 2009, 09:58:37 AM
Squamish 2009, gently released....needless to say would have been good for the smoker. My cleanest to date. ;D
(http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w216/derekerlandson/stampcoho002.jpg)


hey derek..my old eyes deceiving me...but you have that fish as a stamp coho (not chum) on your photo jpg descriptors??
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: dereke on October 23, 2009, 11:55:41 AM
hey derek..my old eyes deceiving me...but you have that fish as a stamp coho (not chum) on your photo jpg descriptors??
Just the folder it went into when I dumped it to my computer. Im kind of lazy with that kind of stuff. As you can see by the fish it is obviously not a coho. ::) ::) So what does it matter? Not sure I understand what you are getting at Dennis.



One quick pointer, if you don't mind.
Did you fish above or below the M.?



Milo this fish was caught on the lower river. The upper part of the lower river is much more consistent right now above the Mamquam when visibility hasn't been blown right out.
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: aquaboy24 on November 02, 2009, 10:05:20 PM
I remember my cousin catching a green one like that in the Stave. He went to release it, and as he picked it up out of the water, he recoiled in horror as hundreds of worms erupted from the gills slits and ran down his arms. It remains the most discusting thing I have seen while fishing............
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: aquaboy24 on November 02, 2009, 10:07:33 PM
which reminds me.....watch your smoked fish carefully if you put it in right out of the river (ie, no freezing)....even ocean caught pink and chum can have ring worms that do the dance of death as they try to beat the heat. Disgusting.  As of last year, when I smoked two pinks I caught off the Sunshine Coast showed worms on smoking (1 each), I decided to freeze all my smoker fish first....even though they are clean, I would rather be ignorant of what is lurking inside them.
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: bluenoser on November 04, 2009, 10:57:57 AM
[I remember my cousin catching a green one like that in the Stave. He went to release it, and as he picked it up out of the water, he recoiled in horror as hundreds of worms erupted from the gills slits and ran down his arms.]

Yikes aquaboy...although I think I've seen a few of those bonked on the Stave....gak.

After several similar comments about the occasional worm I think I'll freeze all of the fish headed to the smoker.

Was out to the Stave last Sunday morning and caught and released several which did not seem smoker worthy...still trying for clean chum.
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: SMo007 on November 06, 2009, 02:54:21 PM
Hey bluenoser. Been meaning to ask you, does your name come from being a Rangers supporter or a Nova Scotian.
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: bluenoser on November 09, 2009, 01:43:21 PM
Nova Scotian which made me a Montreal fan...never a Ranger fan.
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: SMo007 on November 09, 2009, 03:29:37 PM
Nova Scotian which made me a Montreal fan...never a Ranger fan.

That actually made me laugh out loud. I didn't mean New York Rangers, I meant Glasgow Rangers. I was born in Glasgow and grew up a Rangers supporter. One of the many nicknames of supporters of the team are "bluenose" or "bluenosers" I would have thought a lad from "New Scotland" would have known that. ;)
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: bluenoser on November 09, 2009, 04:20:09 PM
Oops...didn't mean to diss your Glasgow Rangers.

Bet you didn't eat any smoked Chum over there?
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: scouterjames on November 09, 2009, 08:59:22 PM
Question - a friend smoked some chum that we caught on the stave after freezing it for a couple of days.  The fish came out VERY mushy - some of them were darker than I would have liked, but he wanted to take them home...  Anyone give me an idea of why they came out mushy?  Other fish he had smoked (at least the ones that he brought fishing for me to try) were fine (pinks and a chum).  Is he doing something wrong or is it chum or is it cause they were a bit dark when caught?? or or or...
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: dereke on December 10, 2009, 03:18:55 PM
Question - a friend smoked some chum that we caught on the stave after freezing it for a couple of days.  The fish came out VERY mushy - some of them were darker than I would have liked, but he wanted to take them home...  Anyone give me an idea of why they came out mushy?  Other fish he had smoked (at least the ones that he brought fishing for me to try) were fine (pinks and a chum).  Is he doing something wrong or is it chum or is it cause they were a bit dark when caught?? or or or...

The reason for this is the fish is past it due. Sometime they will be in pretty decent shape and will still come out mushy. Feel the shoulders behind the neck (not on the beach still in the water) if they feel firn it will be good, if not back she goes. It can be decieving as some chum will appear to be in good shape but still mushy. In my experience a male that is a tiny bit dark can be ok as where a female in the same shape will be mushy. Males have far superior meat in my experience.But to answer your question it is about the quality of the fish when it was bonked not the freezing etc.
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: Eagleye on December 10, 2009, 09:52:17 PM
Question - a friend smoked some chum that we caught on the stave after freezing it for a couple of days.  The fish came out VERY mushy - some of them were darker than I would have liked, but he wanted to take them home...  Anyone give me an idea of why they came out mushy?  Other fish he had smoked (at least the ones that he brought fishing for me to try) were fine (pinks and a chum).  Is he doing something wrong or is it chum or is it cause they were a bit dark when caught?? or or or...

Same thing happened to me the last couple times I smoked Chum, I was  going  to give up on reataining them but I will try Dereke's trick
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: Hookbender on December 10, 2009, 11:12:41 PM
Ohhhh the good old days..........cold smoked sockeye!
(http://i1022.photobucket.com/albums/af349/birssman/food062.jpg)
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: dereke on December 15, 2009, 07:39:10 PM
Ohhhh the good old days..........cold smoked sockeye!
(http://i1022.photobucket.com/albums/af349/birssman/food062.jpg)

Love the home made smokers!
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: Hookbender on December 15, 2009, 08:51:14 PM
You got that right!.............cost me about $40.00 to build,wired up with four recycled vent fans to circulate the smoke.Simple is best!
Bon Appetite!
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: Hookbender on December 15, 2009, 09:00:17 PM
No!...that's not an outhouse!!!!
(http://i1022.photobucket.com/albums/af349/birssman/LastNight014.jpg)
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: scouterjames on December 16, 2009, 07:02:51 AM
No!...that's not an outhouse!!!!
(http://i1022.photobucket.com/albums/af349/birssman/LastNight014.jpg)

OOOOOOPSIE - sorry bout the er, um *blush*  :o - Either NO MORE PARTIES or LABEL THE DANG THING!  ;)
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: gordc on December 16, 2009, 01:58:08 PM
if the fish has been frozen prior to smoking is it safe to freeze again after smoking?
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: wayne on January 02, 2010, 09:32:01 PM
Most commercially made smoked or candied salmon are frozen ahead of time, to help dry out the meat, to create a firmer texture,  before brining and smoking. The product is safe to refreeze once the smoking process in completed. It's best to vacuum pack the salmon if your planning to store it for a long period of time.
Title: Re: Is it Smoker worthy?
Post by: gordc on January 05, 2010, 10:14:24 AM
Good to know.