Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Fishing in British Columbia => Fishing Reports => Members' Fishing Reports => Topic started by: Fish Assassin on October 04, 2005, 10:38:18 AM

Title: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: Fish Assassin on October 04, 2005, 10:38:18 AM
Just returned from an hour on the Cap. Water is down approx. 12" from yesterday. No sign of springs or cohos. Managed to hook one ugly chum. (The works - big teeth, purple bars, black chin etc)
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: coleg on October 04, 2005, 01:09:10 PM
Can somebody clarify retention of chinooks at Cap? Regulations posted at Cable pool states 'no fishing for chinooks until Oct 16' whereas online regulation (http://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/recfish/Freshwater/region2_e.htm) says 'Jan 01-Dec 31
 4 per day, only 1 may be over 62cm.'

I've heard people taking chinooks lately and other people blaming them.
Confused :o
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: Fish Assassin on October 04, 2005, 02:22:36 PM
You are allowed to retain 4 chinooks but only one can be over 62 cms. The daily limit is still 4, any combination of cohos and chinooks.
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: Gooey on October 04, 2005, 05:28:52 PM
Thats an old notice...they should update it!
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: lucky on October 04, 2005, 06:24:10 PM
 Just got back from the cap, tried a few different locations and ended up just down from the hwy bridge.  Feeling a little sick to my stomach from watching all the long floaters snag fish, I think Im just about ready to give up river fishing.  And to the white guy with black work overalls and goattee, good job on the fish you snagged and bonked, hope that you take it home and make your family real proud of the fish you snagged.
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: phatwop on October 04, 2005, 07:27:01 PM
i hear you. the snagging under the highway bridge is brutal. i arrived at first light this morning with a buddy and we were pretty vocal in a non-confrontational tone with how people were getting fish and kept asking loudly, "are you allowed to keep fish hooked in it's side?", " because i'm positive that you're not." some let their fish go, others just left.

it's a small area by that pool, so people feel quite defensive all the time and i think their guilt gets the better of them eventually and they leave after seeing that there are some people who aren't into snagging fish. most are snagging chums for roe and leave the carcass for the seagulls and eagles.
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: Rodney on October 04, 2005, 07:32:50 PM
coleg, an email has been sent to the DFO staff responsible for those notices and hopefully it will be taken care of soon. Please send me an email if you don't see any changes next time when you're out there.
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: scalper66 on October 04, 2005, 09:57:19 PM
what i still havnt seen a chum on the cap river? do they not go up to the hatchery>
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: GoldHammeredCroc on October 04, 2005, 10:02:24 PM
Maybe they spawn in Brother's Creek which flows in to the Cap a little further down.  I love fishing that Highway bridge pool, and the strange thing is that I have never seen anyone snagging fish there.   There is the odd time, but they've all been put back.  Haven't been out yet this year though.
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: coleg on October 04, 2005, 11:27:09 PM
coleg, an email has been sent to the DFO staff responsible for those notices and hopefully it will be taken care of soon. Please send me an email if you don't see any changes next time when you're out there.

Thanks Rod for follow up. I left them voice mail as well, hopefully they will get back one way or other. Consistency of regulation versions will remove unnecessary tensions between anglers :)
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: tookie on October 05, 2005, 09:42:13 AM
I founds a few chum in a pool just down from the suspension bridge, so I do believe they head all the way to the hatchery.  Up until this year I had no idea that there were chum in this river. 

Went fishing yesterday and found no fish.  Oh well, time to hit the vedder.


Cheers,

Tookie
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: meca_357 on October 05, 2005, 11:14:47 AM
tookie you got mail
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: ~IvAn~ on October 05, 2005, 01:25:03 PM
I thought the chums were all from Brothers cr.?
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: Rodney on October 05, 2005, 01:46:35 PM
coleg or anyone else, is that notice at Cable pool a paper notice or a metal sign?
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: Fish Assassin on October 05, 2005, 02:10:10 PM
Paper notice
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: Fish Assassin on October 05, 2005, 03:34:11 PM
If you want springs, your best bet is the Vedder system.
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: jettabambino on October 05, 2005, 03:40:47 PM
i didnt know that the cap had chums either... I have fished it now for about 15 years and have yet to catch a single chum... hmm ... might be a good thing though... ;)
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: lucky on October 05, 2005, 09:07:21 PM
 Caught a big ugly chum today, fought it for a while the whole time thinking I had a nice fresh spring on, but alas when I got it close to shore the first thing I notice was all the dark bars down the side and a big nasty set of teeth. :P
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: JackFunk on October 06, 2005, 12:36:16 AM
Last year I saw a lovely chum couple doing the mating dance up at Dogleg, and a maybe a half dozen more milling around at Three Rock. Up until that point I had no idea there were chum in the cap.
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: badboi on October 07, 2005, 01:34:58 AM
can someone post the link of the salmon limts for all the species at the cap to clear the confusion?

thx
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: No_way on October 07, 2005, 01:44:33 AM
You are allowed to retain 4 chinooks but only one can be over 62 cms. The daily limit is still 4, any combination of cohos and chinooks.

what's the confusion?  FA is totally right.
Title: Re: Capilano Oct. 4
Post by: badboi on October 07, 2005, 07:52:42 AM
guessed i missed that.. so no chums and pinks then,
great!
thx