Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Fishing in British Columbia => General Discussion => Topic started by: yoda on March 14, 2010, 04:45:58 PM

Title: cameras
Post by: yoda on March 14, 2010, 04:45:58 PM
I have a 5yr old pentax optio wr 4 megapixel. i've always enjoyed the flexibility of where i can take pics but i'm noticing the quallity of some of the pictures that you guys are posting and am blown away at some of the shots of fish under the water. talking to a salesman as opposed to people using them in the field , i would tend to choose the later. would greatly appreciate your input.
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: shizz on March 14, 2010, 05:00:56 PM
Check out the Olympus Stylus tough range, or the newer Panasonic Lumix HD waterproof cams.

http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/cpg_digital.asp?section=stylustough

http://www.cnet.com.au/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ft1-339294668.htm

Ive used the Olympus Stylus for the past few years and ive been more than happy with it. Thinking about upgrading to the Lumix though for its HD video capabilities.
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: Fisherama on March 14, 2010, 05:27:04 PM
I currently use the Olympus stylus 850SW as well, but used to use a Pentax Optio W30 for work (I believe there are W80s now).  I've got to admit that I found that the Pentax Optio took nicer pics overall...  Has anyone tried the Canon Powershot D10?  
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: marmot on March 14, 2010, 05:33:36 PM
I have the d10

(http://i94.photobucket.com/albums/l101/marmotus/IMG_3929.jpg)
(http://i94.photobucket.com/albums/l101/marmotus/IMG_3806.jpg)

I like it although it is technically my wife's camera.  I'll be getting the new pentax waterproof one when it comes out.
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: bbronswyk2000 on March 14, 2010, 05:54:44 PM
Optio has a new one either coming out or is out. It looks superior to all others

Here is the review

http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022411pentaxoptiow90.asp
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: HOOK on March 14, 2010, 07:34:54 PM
Thanks for that Brian  ;D that looks like a sweet camera

been looking for a good camera for the wife so i can have my Olympus back LOL This one looks like it might be her Mothers Day gift this year (first mothers day ;D)
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: mr.p on March 14, 2010, 10:31:08 PM
It all depends how much you are looking to spend.  If you're looking for a point and shoot camera, you have about a dozen choices.  If you want a DSLR you have Canon and Nikon.  I worked as a professional photographer for 7 years.  In my experience, I can say that generally you get what you pay for.  One of the most important things to look for is a fast lens, large aperature lens.  Try to get one that opens up to F2.8 at the wide zoom.  Another handy feature on most cameras these days is HD video.  I find myself shooting more video than I do pictures these days.  With HD you can pull decent stills from the video.

Fujifilm and Panasonic produce amazing images.  Very sharp and good colour reproduction.  I believe most Panasonic point and shoots use Leica lenses.  Can't go wrong with Leica glass.

Personally, for fishing I use a Pentax WS80.  Its ok.  But I would not recommend it.  There is too much image noise at higher ISOs.  Its great in good lighting but not so good otherwise.
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: milo on March 14, 2010, 10:34:14 PM
The Canon d10 is superior to anything out there in its class, but if I were in the market for a new all weather/underwater point and shoot, I'd wait for the Optio W90 to hit the stores - the cat's behind, apparently! ;D
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: eat_sleep_fish on March 15, 2010, 12:51:50 AM
I have recently stumbled upon these cameras, I am kinda interested in getting one.  They are HD movie cameras with a wide angled lens and underwater housings, http://www.goprocamera.com/products, decently priced too.  You can get their standard def one for $140 US, their HD one with all the trimmings is $300

Also, I notice that the canadian online retailer gpscity.ca carries these cameras, http://www.gpscity.ca/video-cameras.html
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: Mat9 on March 15, 2010, 04:59:34 PM
I have a 7.2mp Olympus too and love the quality and ease of use. The only problem was the thing would suck AA batteries dry within about 5-10 pictures. I had to get a rechargeable lithium battery and now works like a charm. Got 2 batteries and charger off ebay for $20.
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: HOOK on March 15, 2010, 07:47:44 PM
my girlfriend looked up reviews for that Pentax Optio W90 after i told her i might buy it for her. Apparently they have been out for about a year in the U.S. and the revies for it are not good at all  :( Think i will get her a Canon D10 because these cameras are very nice  ;D
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: lucky on March 15, 2010, 08:10:09 PM
my girlfriend looked up reviews for that Pentax Optio W90 after i told her i might buy it for her. Apparently they have been out for about a year in the U.S. and the revies for it are not good at all  :( Think i will get her a Canon D10 because these cameras are very nice  ;D

The canon d10 did get some good reviews but after seeing the size of one I decided to go with the panasonic lumix ts1 and couldn't be happier. The D10 is huge for a point and shoot and reminded me of the bulky first generation digitals.
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: bbronswyk2000 on March 15, 2010, 08:32:05 PM
my girlfriend looked up reviews for that Pentax Optio W90 after i told her i might buy it for her. Apparently they have been out for about a year in the U.S. and the revies for it are not good at all  :( Think i will get her a Canon D10 because these cameras are very nice  ;D

Can you post some links to these bad reviews? I plan on making the W90 my next camera and would like to see reviews from all perspectives.
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: aquapaloosa on March 15, 2010, 09:59:32 PM
I always enjoy camera chat for I use mine allot.
I am a pentax (w60)guy for sure. and I use a olympus 850 too and it is tough. 
The thing that sucks the most about both of them is that the HD is pour.  Always be careful when dealing with video.  Just becouse it says it is HD means little.
Having said that the panasonic camera has good hd ( 1280x720)but it is in a "custom" or "uncommon" video format which requires translation software which in the reviews says crashes PC's often.  Sounds like a rash to me.  I do not like my 850 for it uses a uncommon memory card. Same kind of rash.

Having seen the new pentax w90 I am pumped!! it has HD ( 1280x720)  Also has superior macro functions which is fun to take pictures of bugs and real small stuff.

Title: Re: cameras
Post by: HOOK on March 15, 2010, 10:02:11 PM
Nevermind guys  ::) the wife thought she had the right camera but it was infact the W80 she looked up which does have alot of bad reviews which is probably why Mr.P says he doesnt really like it.

I will be looking at this W90 when it comes out for sure........maybe a store will give me a deal for buying 2  ;D

the biggest thing i like about this camera is that it can take super macro shots as close as 1cm !!!
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: eat_sleep_fish on March 15, 2010, 10:06:54 PM
Wow, is this the W90 you're talking about?  http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022411pentaxoptiow90.asp

Looks awesome!
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: aquapaloosa on March 15, 2010, 10:07:17 PM
Sorry I made a bit of a mistake on my last post.
1280x720 is "HD"  but it is what the w60 has already.  So it is not an improvement.
Still I like the looks of that w90!
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: bbronswyk2000 on March 15, 2010, 10:30:00 PM
Nevermind guys  ::) the wife thought she had the right camera but it was infact the W80 she looked up which does have alot of bad reviews which is probably why Mr.P says he doesnt really like it.

I will be looking at this W90 when it comes out for sure........maybe a store will give me a deal for buying 2  ;D

the biggest thing i like about this camera is that it can take super macro shots as close as 1cm !!!

Thats what I thought ;)

We have discussed this in length on another forum. The W80 was a terrible addition to the Optio series and thats the reason they came out with the W90 quicker than expected. That macro mode looks amazing as well as now having HD movie mode.
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: canso on May 18, 2010, 01:00:24 PM
I noticed London Drugs has the W-90 on sale this week for $329
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: HOOK on May 19, 2010, 01:24:35 PM
Canso - I noticed that also. I also noticed they have the same camera with a floating wrist strap for the same price  ;D
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: Every Day on May 19, 2010, 01:40:17 PM
Canso - I noticed that also. I also noticed they have the same camera with a floating wrist strap for the same price  ;D

Get the floating wrist strap!
Then you won't lose your camera in the river and have to buy another one like I did lol.
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: HOOK on May 19, 2010, 01:41:46 PM
ya i was thinking of you when i saw the wrist strap HA HA HA !! i also watched a guy drop his camera in a lake last year, man did he ever curse for awhile  :o
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: Driller on May 19, 2010, 05:00:52 PM
I have a GoPro camera.  It takes great pics, and great HD video.  I posted a video on here a few days ago, and in it there are still shots which were taken with it.  Keep in mind that when you upload video on youtube it is not as clear as it is on your own computer, or television.  It's about half the quality.

I'd buy it directly from their web site.  It is cheaper, and they offer warranty on everything, with very rapid service.  I broke a buckle, and they sent me a new one in about a week via fed ex.
Title: Re: cameras
Post by: andychan on May 20, 2010, 10:49:27 AM
I'm very impressed with the Panasonic TS-2.  A bit more money but it does HD video and outstanding photos too. I have the earlier version, the TS-1 which I recently promised to my mom for mothers day.

Here's some pics of the TS-2 (around $380cnd)

# 28mm Wide-angle Lens
# 4.6x Optical Zoom / 6x Intelligent Zoom / 9.8x Extra Optical ZoomNew
# Shockproof, Waterproof, Freezeproof and Dustproof Protections up to 30 feet!

(http://images116.fotki.com/v693/photos/7/946657/7708819/P1020052-vi.jpg)

(http://images50.fotki.com/v1528/photos/7/946657/7708819/P1020315-vi.jpg)

(http://images49.fotki.com/v1520/photos/7/946657/7708819/P1010818-vi.jpg)




Title: Re: cameras
Post by: aquapaloosa on June 14, 2010, 07:30:52 PM
Some digital images I took with my new pentax W 90 using the microscope macro function.
The hooks and bugs are all about size 18 or smaller.  So far so good with this camera. 
(http://i944.photobucket.com/albums/ad287/aquapaloosa/IMGP0205.jpg)
(http://i944.photobucket.com/albums/ad287/aquapaloosa/IMGP0261.jpg)
(http://i944.photobucket.com/albums/ad287/aquapaloosa/IMGP0258.jpg)
(http://i944.photobucket.com/albums/ad287/aquapaloosa/IMGP0286.jpg)
(http://i944.photobucket.com/albums/ad287/aquapaloosa/IMGP0226.jpg)