Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum
Fishing in British Columbia => General Discussion => Topic started by: chris gadsden on November 21, 2007, 05:46:45 PM
-
I have just been informed that the Supreme Court of Canada has rejected the request for appeal by the Cheam Band members in the Douglas case.
This case stemmed from 2000 when a charge was layed for fishing for Early Stuart Sockeye during a closed time. Those charged put forth a case that there was a recreational fishery for chinook at the time so they had a right to fish also.
I am told the law now says the FN do not have absolute priority and that managers can allow fisheries by others while FN FSC fishery is closed.
-
Mute point these days with Sockeye closures etc. :P
-
That's a weard arguement from the FN band. Rec. has opening on Chinook salmon not Sockeye. But they were fishing for sockeye.
-
Its kind of the same arguement Earnie Cray (sp??) petitioned DFO with to shut the fraser down to sporties this summer when sports fishers were ignoring the selective fishing methods request. Makes sense this summer as flossing springs has a definite sockeye by catch but as a defence for FNs fishing early stewarts...its pretty weak.
Mute point Trout Breath?!? How so, if sockeye stocks are weak then its good to know we (sporties) can still have a chinook fishery without that meaning FN fishers can have a sockeye opening at thee same time.
And its always a good thing when ANYONE fishing outside an opening/poaching or what ever gets a kick in the my friend for their transgressions. Glad to see that the FN fisher in this case couldnt use the charter to hide behind and protect his sorry my friend from his poaching activities!
-
The Tsawassen(sp) treaty etc will allow them to net the fish anyway.We will have the closure. The Cheam could sign a treaty that recognizes there tradition claim to even more fish than other tribes by appling pressure to a ruling party eager to settle claims. They (Cheam) will put pressure to close most sport fishing down with the help of others screaming sport fishers are snaggers all the time. A worst case scenerio that may not happen, but don't be too sure about anything right now until you see how these treaties work out.
-
Even this summer the claim is still weak. Mortality rate for C&R is 15% for salmon. While FN had the closure during summer for none sockeye retaintion they still netted the river same as last year, netting during none opening time. That is 100% mortality.
Reality is no matter what rec sector does, FN will find excuse to have everyone away from river.
-
Even this summer the claim is still weak. Mortality rate for C&R is 15% for salmon. While FN had the closure during summer for none sockeye retaintion they still netted the river same as last year, netting during none opening time. That is 100% mortality.
Reality is no matter what rec sector does, FN will find excuse to have everyone away from river.
Where do you get 15% from, I have never heard this number before. I think your a bit off.
-
15 % i don't think is accurate for all species.
sockeye alone is about 40% mortality you would think that most guys would get there two and go home, but no they sit there all day and will tell everyone "i got 50 today" :P it's a shame that these people don't understand that 20 of those fish will die. that really gets under my skin. >:(
-
From DFO and Washing Sates Fishery has similar result.
20% for coho in Areas 1 & 2; 16% for coho in Areas 3 to 10; 10% for coho in other areas; 15% for chinook in all areas.
Sockeye range from 20 to 40% Depending on water temperature, time out of water. and believe it or not when caught don't try to touch it to remove hook. Just cut as close to hook as possible and in water this will reduce mortality by 20%
-
Here's an upcoming case that the Supreme Court will be hearing, so keep your eyes and ears open for the decision:
"On December 11, the Supreme Court of Canada will hear R. v. Kapp, a constitutional challenge to the federal government’s current fisheries policy. The Japanese Canadian Fishermen’s Association is intervening in R. v. Kapp to argue that racial segregation of the workplace violates Canada’s constitution."
I understand this relates to the FN being allowed to fish commercially when no one else can, even though the Constitution only refers to the FN having first rights to "food, social, and ceremonial" fisheries.
-
15 % i don't think is accurate for all species.
sockeye alone is about 40% mortality you would think that most guys would get there two and go home, but no they sit there all day and will tell everyone "i got 50 today" :P it's a shame that these people don't understand that 20 of those fish will die. that really gets under my skin. >:(
This is one of reasons why I believe you will no longer see a sockeye opening on the Fraser River for the recreational sector.
-
Since the Vickers decision (Nov 22,2007) Treaty negotiations will likely cease as Aboriginal Title has been recognized throughout BC. BC is not in the same
position as the rest of the country because the feds rushed into purchasing BC from people who were not the land owners. It's like buying a car from
someone and the cops come and charge you for being in posession of a stolen vehicle. Same principles only the cops took a long time tracking down the
stolen vehicle.
I'm reading the Standing Committee's Evidence from Nov 2001. It makes me wonder about things.
How much fish does a commercial boat hold?
According to one of the presenters Sockeye are a "hearty fish" so when they do selective fishing (by means of shaking the fish out of the nets)
they suspect that "1 in 10 will die" For the entire fleet, how many fish actually die?
Another thing is when the Hudson Bay Company first made counts of the fish, they suspected there were "100 million" returning to the rivers.
Why is it now that managment of salmon is required because fish disturb the other nests and result in an off year for spawning? Prior to any
management of the salmon, any non natives selling fish, the fish were coming in abundance on a regular basis?
-
Another thing is when the Hudson Bay Company first made counts of the fish, they suspected there were "100 million" returning to the rivers.
Why is it now that managment of salmon is required because fish disturb the other nests and result in an off year for spawning? Prior to any
management of the salmon, any non natives selling fish, the fish were coming in abundance on a regular basis?
One reason I can think of is habitat destruction; loss of suitable spawning grounds. But I do think they exploit this of course.
-
Im very happy with the decision I think its great news for sport fising and the salmon.
-
Since the Vickers decision (Nov 22,2007) Treaty negotiations will likely cease as Aboriginal Title has been recognized throughout BC. BC is not in the same
position as the rest of the country because the feds rushed into purchasing BC from people who were not the land owners. It's like buying a car from
someone and the cops come and charge you for being in posession of a stolen vehicle. Same principles only the cops took a long time tracking down the
stolen vehicle.
While true. But the origional owner will need to proof he/she owns the vehicle through purchasing/trade... and it all comes down to registry and having a legal system that justify such claim. When there is no such system in place, who gets what? How is it's ownership kept track?
-
Since the Vickers decision (Nov 22,2007) Treaty negotiations will likely cease as Aboriginal Title has been recognized throughout BC. BC is not in the same
position as the rest of the country because the feds rushed into purchasing BC from people who were not the land owners. It's like buying a car from
someone and the cops come and charge you for being in posession of a stolen vehicle. Same principles only the cops took a long time tracking down the
stolen vehicle.
While true. But the origional owner will need to proof he/she owns the vehicle through purchasing/trade... and it all comes down to registry and having a legal system that justify such claim. When there is no such system in place, who gets what? How is it's ownership kept track?
Fn's history is an oral history and that can be proven in a court of law. There have been arceological digs that have proven the exhistance of aboriginals for thousands of years and as well written history of early exploreres here in the 1700's. You can't sell something that's not yours. It's like walking on the vedder in october ,taking everyone's fishing rods and selling them. No one has any papers for that but they know it's there's.
Remember the term"First nations"!
Hotrod
-
So the reason they got the land is they're here first? How is the boundary determind?
-
They use to kill each other to determin it. ;D Fortunately those days are over, well sort of. :-\ It's about time something was done to settle the claims though.
-
So should the land be givien to the annhilalated tribes or the tribes that won?
-
There will be a scientific mortality test done on the Fraser this coming year, to address the question of Sockeye catch and release mortality.
There are at present NO stats. on this. All the stats are from ocean fishing.
15 % i don't think is accurate for all species.
sockeye alone is about 40% mortality you would think that most guys would get there two and go home, but no they sit there all day and will tell everyone "i got 50 today" :P it's a shame that these people don't understand that 20 of those fish will die. that really gets under my skin. >:(
This is one of reasons why I believe you will no longer see a sockeye opening on the Fraser River for the recreational sector.