Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Fishing in British Columbia => Fishing Reports => Members' Fishing Reports => Topic started by: dereke on August 07, 2007, 08:41:11 AM

Title: pinks on the mamquam August 4th/5th, 2007
Post by: dereke on August 07, 2007, 08:41:11 AM
had a few great days over the weekend with great weather and lots of fish. was into ten to fifteen a day. alot of fun on a 6 weight. still not a ton of fish n the river but even noticed a difference over the three days with the number of fish coming in. heading down there right now. will post some pics later.

tight lines

derek
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: river walker on August 07, 2007, 09:27:13 AM
still pretty dirty up there , any springs moving ??
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: dennisK on August 07, 2007, 11:57:04 AM
are you allowed to retain pinks?
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: MERC on August 07, 2007, 12:02:40 PM
are you allowed to retain pinks?

No.

http://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/recfish/Freshwater/region2_e.htm
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: wading2fish on August 07, 2007, 12:03:17 PM
http://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/recfish/Freshwater/region2_e.htm

Unless otherwise stated: zero!  They should put something in red lettering though, to make it more clear...
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: Xgolfman on August 07, 2007, 02:22:44 PM
Post removed.. No point trying to share anymore..

Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: reeler on August 07, 2007, 03:17:00 PM
The water is ok for the speyflossing method they use in that spot below the Mamquam mouth. I was there last week and the guides were putting on a show. Two guys were standing way out in the river talking with their weighted flies hanging downstream for several minutes like bait. The survey volunteer guy on the beach told me about 12 fish were hooked all day by the same method. It gets easier when the fish start to pile up. Some of them are good at casting the big rods, but with all that room behind for backcasting, a spey rod has little advantage.
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: Xgolfman on August 07, 2007, 03:44:07 PM
The water is ok for the speyflossing method they use in that spot below the Mamquam mouth. I was there last week and the guides were putting on a show. Two guys were standing way out in the river talking with their weighted flies hanging downstream for several minutes like bait. The survey volunteer guy on the beach told me about 12 fish were hooked all day by the same method. It gets easier when the fish start to pile up. Some of them are good at casting the big rods, but with all that room behind for backcasting, a spey rod has little advantage.

Spoken like someone who hasn't got a clue!!! Must have pissed you off you couldn't snag something with your baitcaster right???

Don't need to stand way out in the river the fish are close

don't use weighted flies or you'll be hung up on the bottom constantly.

12 hooked all day with that method means that method doesn't work...

backcasting room is only one reason to use the spey and has nothing to do with why you would use them up there...or very at least very little..Before you spout off any more ridiculous statements try learning your facts a little more first huh??? Look around you one here, why is it so dead??? Cause guys like you showed up!!!!
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: jetboatjim on August 07, 2007, 03:58:22 PM
Dont worrie golfie Gearbag dosent know what he's talkin about, they just get jelouse because some fly guy catches more than him.

I find it pretty hard to floss pinks on stripped flies or flies that hang below you.
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: SnakeRoll on August 07, 2007, 03:59:37 PM
yep yep yep
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: dereke on August 07, 2007, 04:25:16 PM
hilarious that everyone on this site (im sure its the same on others) fights like a bunch of little school girls. doesnt seem to matter what the topic is or anything. play this cupcakes.
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: bravo252 on August 07, 2007, 04:39:15 PM
so......... DFO always doesn't allow to retain pinks in Squish and Mamquam so far?? ???
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: DragonSpeed on August 07, 2007, 04:53:56 PM
hilarious that everyone on this site (im sure its the same on others) fights like a bunch of little school girls. doesnt seem to matter what the topic is or anything. **** this ****.

You figure out who to listen to, and who to ignore.  Selective reading helps (although not really possible if you're a mod :( )
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: bkk on August 07, 2007, 05:45:02 PM
The last time the Squamish and Mamquam were open to Pink retention was in 2003. That was a very large run and everthing looked good with an excellent spawn. Then we had the huge 2003 flood which moved the river around in a major way. The fry monitoring on the Cheakamus indicated low egg to fry survival  ( no big surprise there ) so the 2005 return was already  generating concern before it returned to the river. Then on top of that we had the 2005 Cheakamus chemical spill which did significant damage to the surviving pinks from the original 2003 escapement. We are now in 2007 and were seeing the returns form the chemical spill. Todate returns have been slow which kind of makes sense as the spill happened on Aug 5, 2005 effectivly killing the early returning fish. There was a resonable return to the Mamquam system in 2005 but the Cheakamus was very poor. It is now just a matter of waiting to see if the run improves or it just dribbles in. When the river was open for retention, it closed on the Labour day weekend so were only looking at about 3 weeks from now. I would not hold my breath expecting a retention fishery this year. I for one would not reccomend it as I do not beleive that the run has recovered enought for that.
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: steelyflyfisher on August 07, 2007, 06:28:05 PM
anyone been fishing out there today?
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: Xgolfman on August 07, 2007, 07:32:12 PM
Dont worrie golfie Gearbag dosent know what he's talkin about, they just get jelouse because some fly guy catches more than him.

I find it pretty hard to floss pinks on stripped flies or flies that hang below you.

Think I'm going through cigar withdrawls today... >:(  Loonnnng afternoon at work... nice 5 vegas later, feel better, sorry to blow up like that... just hate hearing that crap... mellow...mellow...gotta admit catching the bigger one was about as much fun as I've had in awhile fishin... ;) gotta hook up soon jim... I watched a couple guys sunday who were so damn good, can't figure out what move they were making to get the fly back up, very small almost reverse z ..then smooth as silk line back out and always high above the water..really cool to watch!!
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: jetboatjim on August 07, 2007, 07:58:55 PM
That would be a "snap-T" or reverse "snap-T"
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: GoldHammeredCroc on August 07, 2007, 08:36:57 PM
I'm hoping there is no retention.  The nutrients will be needed upstream and the more fish that successfully spawn = hopefully more in two years times and then the chance for openings.  Pinks seem to be doing really well lately with ever increasing numbers in the lower mainland rivers each year, unlike sockeye and coho which seem to be taking a bit of a beating with ocean survival levels.
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: Xgolfman on August 07, 2007, 11:40:25 PM
That would be a "snap-T" or reverse "snap-T"

I do that as well but mine looks allot bigger, his was tiny...I couldn't do it and I was using my little spey rod...Time for lessons???
Title: Re: pinks on the mamquam
Post by: dereke on August 08, 2007, 09:24:54 PM
there will be NO retntion on pinks this year from what i hear. talked to two dfo officers and both said that returning numbers are extremely low. to bad with the strong run we had in 03. in fact the guy i talked to said it will most likely be closed for the next run as well. it will be good to let the little buggers recover, im all for it.