Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?  (Read 3860 times)

qescott

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 77
Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?
« on: November 01, 2011, 09:49:14 AM »

I'm heading up this coming weekend, and I was wondering if anyone's had any success up there. Or failure, for that matter.
Thanks.
Logged

nickredway

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 616
Re: Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2011, 10:47:38 AM »

I was up there middle of last week and there was barely any fish, dismal so far this year, worse than last year wtf!
Logged

milo

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2106
Re: Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2011, 10:53:32 AM »

Leave those very few Mamquam fish alone...we need EVERY fish to rebuild that run.
Even Catch & Release can have a negative impact if fish are not handled in a top notch manner.

Logged

koko

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 173
Re: Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2011, 11:01:14 AM »

Leave those very few Mamquam fish alone...we need EVERY fish to rebuild that run.
Even Catch & Release can have a negative impact if fish are not handled in a top notch manner.


X2
Logged

nickredway

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 616
Re: Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?
« Reply #4 on: November 01, 2011, 11:06:23 AM »

I'm basing that on the number of fish I counted in two pools that would usually be stacked and speaking to locals up there, I didn't bother fishing it.
Logged

qescott

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 77
Re: Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?
« Reply #5 on: November 01, 2011, 11:18:54 AM »

That doesn't sound good. Where would be a better fishing destination for chum on the fly?
Logged

milo

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2106
Re: Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?
« Reply #6 on: November 01, 2011, 11:27:36 AM »

That doesn't sound good. Where would be a better fishing destination for chum on the fly?

Stave/Vedder/Harrison, especially Stave.
With C&R in place, there's plenty of room for us fly chuckers.

BTW, I just can't wrap my head around the fact that they might reopen chum for retention.
What a joke! >:(
Logged

qescott

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 77
Re: Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?
« Reply #7 on: November 01, 2011, 11:29:32 AM »

Stave/Vedder/Harrison, especially Stave.
With C&R in place, there's plenty of room for us fly chuckers.

BTW, I just can't wrap my head around the fact that they might reopen chum for retention.
What a joke! >:(
Alright, thanks. Stave it is. Uh oh. I chose the mamquam originally because I grew up fishing that river, guess it's time to explore new spots
Logged

Sandman

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1498
Re: Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?
« Reply #8 on: November 01, 2011, 07:00:24 PM »

Stave/Vedder/Harrison, especially Stave.
With C&R in place, there's plenty of room for us fly chuckers.

BTW, I just can't wrap my head around the fact that they might reopen chum for retention.
What a joke! >:(

Looks like the Albion test sets are improving so their estimate is now for >900k, so  it looks like the run was late after all.  More fish should be entering these systems over the next week, so it is now reopened.  The crowds are sure to return.
Logged
Not all those who wander are lost

qescott

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 77
Re: Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?
« Reply #9 on: November 01, 2011, 07:02:24 PM »

is that for the mamquam too, or just the stave?
Logged

Sandman

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1498
Re: Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?
« Reply #10 on: November 01, 2011, 07:06:23 PM »

is that for the mamquam too, or just the stave?

Just the Fraser tribs.
Logged
Not all those who wander are lost

qescott

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 77
Re: Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?
« Reply #11 on: November 01, 2011, 07:08:36 PM »

Damn, you got my hopes up.
Logged

Sandman

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1498
Re: Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?
« Reply #12 on: November 01, 2011, 07:38:36 PM »

Damn, you got my hopes up.

Sorry, it is just the Stave, Nicomen, Harrison and Chehalis.
Logged
Not all those who wander are lost

qescott

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 77
Re: Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?
« Reply #13 on: November 01, 2011, 07:46:33 PM »

edit: nevermind.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2011, 07:56:39 PM by qescott »
Logged

Rodney

  • Administrator
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14765
  • Where's my strike indicator?
    • Fishing with Rod
Re: Anyone fished the Mamquam for Chum recently?
« Reply #14 on: November 01, 2011, 11:22:15 PM »

If you are only interested in catching and releasing chum salmon, then consider the Chilliwack River as well. We were there today and quite a few chum salmon, some pretty fresh, were showing in slower waters that are suitable for fly fishing. Since retention remains closed for Chilliwack River unlike other systems, it should remain pretty quiet in terms of angling pressure. We were fishing by ourselves without a sign of other anglers most of the time today.