Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Sturgeon found in nets  (Read 8371 times)

Zackattack

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 185
Re: Sturgeon found in nets
« Reply #15 on: September 10, 2015, 03:04:22 PM »

Socks n Springs are tho  >:(
Glad you called that in! Brutal.
Logged

bbronswyk2000

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3909
  • Not affilaiated with any club.....
Re: Sturgeon found in nets
« Reply #16 on: September 10, 2015, 04:37:29 PM »

Global will be airing a small version of their interview on the Early News at 5pm with the full version airing on the 6pm News
Logged


Belong to the "4 F Club"
Fishing, Football, Fitness and Family

Wiseguy

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 745
Re: Sturgeon found in nets
« Reply #17 on: September 10, 2015, 05:47:18 PM »

Good job dude.
Logged

tworivers

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 79
Re: Sturgeon found in nets
« Reply #18 on: September 10, 2015, 06:25:20 PM »

Besides providing me with my daily dose of Robin Stickley ;D on Global's Early News, I looked forward to veiwing Bryan's discovery.
It's a shame that this situation had occurred, and good on you Bryan for bringing this public.

I'm no sturgeon expert, but a clip early on in the broadcast shows one of the carcasses with what appears to be a long pointed slender nose.
Maybe just a poor viewing angle, but is this not a sturgeon type more commonly found in the Fraser Canyon type waters.

Just an observation...



Logged

salmonlander

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 49
Re: Sturgeon found in nets
« Reply #19 on: September 10, 2015, 06:33:07 PM »

How about posting the phone numbers you called as a refresher for all on here. Thx
Logged

canoe man

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1155
  • and awaaaaaaaay we go!
    • brandywine marine
Re: Sturgeon found in nets
« Reply #20 on: September 10, 2015, 08:18:22 PM »

thanks brian and yes please post the phone numbers
for all to keep
cnm
Logged
president of the HANEY HOOKERS SOCIETY

TNAngler

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 386
Re: Sturgeon found in nets
« Reply #21 on: September 11, 2015, 09:27:01 AM »

I realize this is hard to police but there should be a better way.

I wonder if you couldn't do something where for any non-salt water nets, any cork attached to a net has to have a personal identification number on it.  Any net caught anywhere near fresh water without said number results in a hefty fine.  Sharpie markers are cheap and should be good enough and it wouldn't take that much time to write the numbers on the corks.

Granted, some of the poaching nets don't have corks but it might lessen it some.
Logged

Burbot

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 169
Re: Sturgeon found in nets
« Reply #22 on: September 11, 2015, 09:43:40 AM »

I saw this on the cbc web site. Good for you. :)
Logged

fic

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 855
Re: Sturgeon found in nets
« Reply #23 on: September 11, 2015, 09:47:34 AM »

Embed Microchips in the Gill nets somewhere so at least they can identify when and where it was sold.
Logged

clarki

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1983
Re: Sturgeon found in nets
« Reply #24 on: September 11, 2015, 10:47:01 AM »

Bryan, do you think the nets were set to catch salmon (the sturgeon were by-catch) and when the poachers removed the salmon, they just left the sturgeon and the net on the shore? 
Logged

TNAngler

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 386
Re: Sturgeon found in nets
« Reply #25 on: September 11, 2015, 11:10:14 AM »

Embed Microchips in the Gill nets somewhere so at least they can identify when and where it was sold.

This likely wouldn't work.  There is very little of the gill net that cannot be replaced and is done frequently.  The lead line, cork line, corks, even netting can all be switched out in a couple days.  You would almost have to have it in the monofiliment netting which first would be easily spotted and second very easy to remove.
Logged