Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Fishing in British Columbia => General Discussion => Topic started by: zimmer on October 10, 2005, 06:05:12 PM

Title: wool vs roe
Post by: zimmer on October 10, 2005, 06:05:12 PM

I seem to have pretty good luck with wool

What is the advantage of Roe?

Title: Re: wool vs roe
Post by: Fish Assassin on October 10, 2005, 06:32:23 PM

It has scent which is a big advantage when you're fishing murky waters.

Title: Re: wool vs roe
Post by: bentrod on October 10, 2005, 07:33:32 PM

Wool is good for current and non-finicky fish.  Roe is also nice if you're slow on the trigger.  The fish seem to hold onto it a little longer. 

Title: Re: wool vs roe
Post by: Floater on October 10, 2005, 08:50:04 PM

Quote from: C.F on October 10, 2005, 07:54:58 PM

Each has it time and place!

Roe doesnt work all the time and same with wool!


Wool is nice as you dont smell like a fish plant at the end of the day!


C.F

Thats why you allways have a towel and a bait box with you. ;D

Title: Re: wool vs roe
Post by: Gillie on October 10, 2005, 08:53:22 PM

Still end up smelly, especially if your Making big sturgie bags

Title: Re: wool vs roe
Post by: James on October 11, 2005, 12:02:59 AM

Like said above each has it's time and place , But I like to use Wool trimmed very neat to the size of 1 egg , then dab some scent on it every couple of casts .