Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Fish Habitat Protection Cut  (Read 3479 times)

StillAqua

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 489
Fish Habitat Protection Cut
« on: June 28, 2012, 11:31:51 AM »

Harper's war on wild fish and the environment takes a new offensive....apparently all of DFOs Habitat Biologists across Canada got notices.

http://www.nationtalk.ca/modules/news/article.php?storyid=57634

"Fisheries and Ocean is receiving particular "attention" from the government, as this represents the third round of cuts at the Department since December 2011. Today's cuts to its Habitat Management program are in line with Bill C-38, the Budget Implementation Act, which removes explicit protection of fish habitat from the Fisheries Act. These professionals are responsible for monitoring, investigating and enforcing provisions of the Act which protect fish and their habitat from the effects of harmful industrial, agricultural and land development activities."
Logged

VAGAbond

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 538
Re: Fish Habitat Protection Cut
« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2012, 12:15:31 PM »

There is little benefit to the GNP from habitat protection.   The only people that care are a few Bubbas out drinking beer and drowning worms and perhaps some environmental terrorists funded by subversive foreign organizations like Ducks Unlimited and the Sierra Club.

People of substance golf, ski and visit upscale shopping malls.   ;) >:(
« Last Edit: July 02, 2012, 10:14:41 AM by VAGAbond »
Logged

Dave

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3378
Re: Fish Habitat Protection Cut
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2012, 03:25:19 PM »

Ugh, sure wish you had put a few  ;) ;) ;) and a couple of these  ::) ::) ::) on that post.

Sadly it seems some people in Ottawa actually believe stuff like that.
Logged

Dave

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3378
Re: Fish Habitat Protection Cut
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2012, 04:55:15 PM »

There is little benefit to the GNP from habitat protection.   The only people that care are a few Bubbas out drinking beer and drowning worms and perhaps some environmental terrorists funded by subversive foreign organizations like Ducks Unlimited and the Sierra Club.

People of substance golf, ski and visit upscale shopping malls.   ;) >:(

much better ;D
Logged

skaha

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1043
Re: Fish Habitat Protection Cut
« Reply #4 on: July 02, 2012, 07:27:52 PM »

- I realize you're talking fed cuts but provincial is just as bad... not filling positions as current people retire.
- Maybe we should be squawking for a return to at least a Fish and Wildlife Branch... that is one that has a vested interest in providing fishing and hunting opportunities to those who pay for it with their licenses... other departments can have the money from taxes in general revenue that we all expend to get out and fish or hunt or even hike and camp on crown land.
Logged

shuswapsteve

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 894
Re: Fish Habitat Protection Cut
« Reply #5 on: July 02, 2012, 07:57:36 PM »

- I realize you're talking fed cuts but provincial is just as bad... not filling positions as current people retire.
- Maybe we should be squawking for a return to at least a Fish and Wildlife Branch... that is one that has a vested interest in providing fishing and hunting opportunities to those who pay for it with their licenses... other departments can have the money from taxes in general revenue that we all expend to get out and fish or hunt or even hike and camp on crown land.
http://www.gofishbc.com/about-us/your-dollars-working.aspx
Logged

skaha

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1043
Re: Fish Habitat Protection Cut
« Reply #6 on: July 03, 2012, 09:45:18 AM »

--"At the time the FFSBC was founded in 2003, the Province also introduced a new funding model where 100% of dollars collected from freshwater fishing licence sales would be reinvested in sport fishing, while general tax revenue would be used to support the conservation and restoration of wild fish populations"

--Nice Spin on the FFSBC site.. notice it indicates a new funding model was introduced... to bad the government has a difference of opinion when it comes to what 100% of the dollars from licenses is.

--It is my understanding the BC wildlife fed has made proposals to the government to recover several million in license fees that still goes into general revenue and does not find its way back into the resource.
Logged

aquapaloosa

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 659
  • They don't call'em fish for nothin.
Re: Fish Habitat Protection Cut
« Reply #7 on: July 03, 2012, 10:22:17 AM »

Quote
--It is my understanding the BC wildlife fed has made proposals to the government to recover several million in license fees that still goes into general revenue and does not find its way back into the resource.]--It is my understanding the BC wildlife fed has made proposals to the government to recover several million in license fees that still goes into general revenue and does not find its way back into the resource.

  Would the wildlife management system see more funds if our license money went back to fishing and hunting?  In the US all or most of there money goes back to fish and wildlife and they seem to have really good management and enforcement. 
« Last Edit: July 03, 2012, 10:24:48 AM by aquapaloosa »
Logged
Chicken farm, pig farm, cow farm, fish farm.

VAGAbond

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 538
Re: Fish Habitat Protection Cut
« Reply #8 on: July 03, 2012, 12:28:31 PM »

Quote
Ugh, sure wish you had put a few    :) :) :)   and a couple of these  ::) ::) ::)    on that post.


Dave, thanks for lesson on how a post can be thoughtless and not deliver the intended message.    The post was of course very much tongue-in-cheek. Emoticons have been added as suggested.

Nothing against golfers or skiers either.  Done that myself.   I just seem to get the impression that those making decisions in Ottawa and Victoria think the great outdoors is a golf course and as long as the grass is green the environment is OK and it happens again and again.
Logged