Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: SOCKEYE ARTICLE FROM TODAYS SURREY LEADER  (Read 2016 times)

troutbreath

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2908
  • I does Christy
SOCKEYE ARTICLE FROM TODAYS SURREY LEADER
« on: July 21, 2006, 12:44:30 PM »

sOCKEYE RUN OFF TO A SLOW START
By Tom Fletcher
Black Press
Jul 21 2006




The 2006 Fraser River sockeye has started out with low returns, but that doesn't mean the anticipated bumper harvest of B.C.'s most valuable salmon fishery won't materialize, government officials say.

The slow start is "not unusual" as the Fraser River system makes a transition from one strain of sockeye to the next, says the latest report from the Pacific Salmon Commission, which manages stocks on behalf of Canada and the U.S.

In their season forecast at the end of June, the commission projected a return of more than 17 million sockeye by the time all the runs are in, with a peak occurring around Aug. 10. Runs later in the summer are expected to provide the majority of the fish.

Sockeye require a river-and-lake system, and most runs are named for their home lakes where young fish are reared. Their four-year cycles out to sea and back are monitored by the commission, established in a 1985 treaty between the U.S. and Canada.

In addition to commercial fishing pressure on the lucrative sockeye, river and ocean temperatures are a concern for scientists, as well as predator species that can combine with warmer water to sharply reduce salmon survival. Test fisheries are conducted to give scientists a snapshot of what is in the river, but are a subject to their own vagaries. A test fishery at Whonnock on Saturday caught no fish, but eight seals were spotted, and seals or sea lions often eat fish in nets before they can be brought aboard.

The salmon are also counted using sonar equipment at Mission, and some are tagged to track their progress electronically.

Two of the scarcest runs in recent years are from Cultus and Sakinaw Lakes. Only 5,800 Cultus Lake sockeye are projected to come back this year. Since they intermingle with other stocks on their way up the river, commercial fishing has been halted entirely in some years to protect them.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada has started a program to eradicate young northern pike from Cultus Lake. Pike feed voraciously on young sockeye, and have proliferated with the spread of milfoil, an invasive weed that provides ideal habitat for pike. The program collects and destroys pike minnows, and also removes the milfoil.

The commission notes that in recent years the runs have been arriving later and encountering high water temperatures, which can kill many of them before they spawn. In this year's run, more than 70 per cent of the production depends on only two late runs, the Quesnel and Late Shuswap.

"The forecast for Quesnel sockeye is particularly uncertain, in part because the fry from the 2002 brood year had a much smaller body size than average, which may result in low marine survival," the commission said.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada determines native and non-native fishing openings in Canadian waters. They are determined by separate agencies in the U.S.
Logged
another SLICE of dirty fish perhaps?

liketofish

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 702
Re: SOCKEYE ARTICLE FROM TODAYS SURREY LEADER
« Reply #1 on: July 21, 2006, 01:29:13 PM »

Interest point about dfo eliminating northern pikeminnow. How? It is about time. We should do it to the Fraser too. Oregon had a bounty on the Columbia for each squashfish head turned in (I think it was 1$ when I read about it). If dfo do the same, I will organize kids on a spare-money making trip. It will definitely help more kids acquire the fishing hobby.  ;D
« Last Edit: July 21, 2006, 01:31:00 PM by liketofish »
Logged

chris gadsden

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13881
Re: SOCKEYE ARTICLE FROM TODAYS SURREY LEADER
« Reply #2 on: July 21, 2006, 02:00:27 PM »

This program for eradication of Northern pikeminows has gone on for a number of years on the Columbia River and Snake River. I believe when I last read they were paying around $8 a fish that was 9 inches or bigger. They have paid out millions of dollars since the program started and some anglers have made over $30,000 a year.

I suggested to FOC what you mentioned about getting a similar program for Cultus. At the local level they supported it but not at the higher level.

Lots of info on this program on the net if you do a search for it.
« Last Edit: July 21, 2006, 06:19:41 PM by chris gadsden »
Logged

Youngin

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 550
Re: SOCKEYE ARTICLE FROM TODAYS SURREY LEADER
« Reply #3 on: July 21, 2006, 03:27:44 PM »

wow... 30,000 for fishing.. not bad :)
Logged

troutbreath

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2908
  • I does Christy
Re: SOCKEYE ARTICLE FROM TODAYS SURREY LEADER
« Reply #4 on: July 21, 2006, 04:03:55 PM »

That part that scares me is, I hope a typo, where they say "pike" in Culus Lake instead of pikeminnow. Don't need pike here with all the bass and bbers.
Logged
another SLICE of dirty fish perhaps?

liketofish

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 702
Re: SOCKEYE ARTICLE FROM TODAYS SURREY LEADER
« Reply #5 on: July 21, 2006, 05:00:46 PM »

 ??? ??? ??? What has Pike to do with bbers? Don't start another bashing round please.
But Chris, if this is true, that should be a good summer job for all young folks in Oregon.  Or, who need a regular job?  ;D ;D ;D
« Last Edit: July 21, 2006, 05:03:56 PM by liketofish »
Logged